Question about sig figs in buffer problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter vande060
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Buffer
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on preparing a 1L acetate buffer with a pH of 5.22, utilizing the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation: pH = pK + log(base/acid). The pK of acetate is given as 4.70, leading to the conclusion that a ratio of 3.3 moles of acetate to 1 mole of acetic acid is required. Participants express confusion regarding the treatment of significant figures, particularly why the value of 0.3 was disregarded in calculations. The conversation highlights the challenges of achieving precise pH measurements in laboratory settings.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation
  • Knowledge of buffer solutions and their components
  • Familiarity with significant figures in chemical calculations
  • Basic skills in pH measurement techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation in detail
  • Research methods for preparing buffer solutions accurately
  • Learn about significant figures and their implications in chemical calculations
  • Explore best practices for pH measurement and calibration of pH meters
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, laboratory technicians, and educators involved in teaching buffer preparation and pH measurement techniques.

vande060
Messages
180
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



prepare 1L of a .1M acetate buffer with a pH of 5.22

Homework Equations



pK of acetate is 4.70

The Attempt at a Solution



this is what my professor did:

ph = pK + log(base/acid)

5.22 = 4.70 + log(base/acid)

antilog(.52) = (base/acid)

3 = (acetate/acetic acid) = 3.3/1

you therefore require 3 moles of acetate for every mole of acetic acid.
--------------------

I don't understand why the .3 was just ignored, it doesn't seem like she should have rounded down...any suggestions? I understand that eventually we will have to use .1M, which will reduce the sig figs to one, but that is not until the next step, and I thought you were not supposed to drop figures early.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't understand it either, especially if the question asks for pH 5.22 - that's quite specific (and difficult to prepare in the standard lab, 5.2 looks more reasonable; most pH meters are not able to reliably measure last digit, so you won't be even able to test it). I would go for 3.3.

Please note - sig figs are a faulty concept, something like "poor mans accuracy". Don't treat them too seriously, accuracy should be evaluated and reported using statistical methods. In the case of solution preparation they can be used as a rule of thumb, but even then you should be vigilant. If 1 means anything between 0.5 and 1.5, and 9 means anything between 8.5 and 9.5, the same one significant digit means about 50% error in the first case and about 5% error in the second case - so something is obviously wrong.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K