Question about the helicity operator

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jdstokes
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Helicity Operator
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the helicity operator in the context of relativistic quantum field theory, specifically examining the commutation relations involving the Dirac Hamiltonian and the operator \vec{\Sigma}\cdot \vec{a}. Participants explore the conditions under which these operators commute and the implications of various mathematical manipulations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that \vec{\Sigma}\cdot \vec{a} commutes with the Dirac Hamiltonian only if \vec{a} is proportional to \vec{p}, providing a detailed mathematical derivation.
  • Another participant corrects a previous statement regarding the symmetry properties of \epsilon_{ijk}, noting that it is anti-symmetric while \partial^j \partial^k is symmetric.
  • A different participant suggests that the anti-symmetry of the terms involved leads to a vanishing result when summed over indices.
  • Further clarification is provided regarding the treatment of the gamma matrices and their role in the calculations.
  • One participant recommends using standard Dirac solutions in two-component form for easier handling of the helicity operator and references the angular momentum operator and relevant literature.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of the mathematical results, particularly regarding the vanishing of certain terms and the conditions for commutation. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives on the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of the mathematical expressions involved and the need for careful consideration of symmetry properties and operator behavior in flat spacetime.

jdstokes
Messages
520
Reaction score
1
In relativistic quantum field theory the Dirac spinors can be chosen to be eigenstates of the helicity operator \vec{\Sigma}\cdot \vec{p} /|\vec{p}|.

I want to show that \vec{\Sigma}\cdot \vec{a} commutes with the Dirac Hamiltonian only if \vec{a}\propto \vec{p}. As usual I'm using Einstein summation everywhere.

[\vec{\Sigma}\cdot \vec{a}, H_\mathrm{Dirac}]\psi=[\vec{\Sigma}\cdot \vec{a}, -i\hbar c \gamma^i\partial_i + mc^2]\psi =-i\hbar c[\Sigma^ia_i, \gamma^i \partial_i]\psi

[\Sigma^i a_i, \gamma^l \partial_l]\psi=[\frac{i}{2}\epsilon^{ijk}\gamma_j\gamma_k a_i, \gamma^l \partial_l]\psi= \frac{i}{2}\epsilon_{ijk}[\gamma^j\gamma^k a^i, \gamma^l \partial_l]\psi = \frac{i}{2}\epsilon_{ijk}(\gamma^j\gamma^k a^i \gamma^l \partial_l-\gamma^l \partial_l\gamma^j\gamma^k a^i ]\psi

since \epsilon^{ijk} = \epsilon_{ijk}(-1)^3 and \gamma_i = -\gamma^i,\, a_i = -a^i in flat spacetime with (+,-,-,-) signature.

Now suppose a^i = \partial^i. Then using equality of mixed partials and dividing out any constants gives

\epsilon_{ijk}(\gamma^j\gamma^k\gamma^l \partial_l\partial^i\psi - \gamma^l\gamma^j\gamma^k \partial_l\partial^i \psi)

Using the relation \{ \gamma^\mu,\gamma^\nu \} = 2\eta^{\mu\nu} twice and the fact that \eta^{ij}\partial_i = \partial^j in flat spacetime gives

\epsilon_{ijk}(\gamma^k \partial^j - \gamma^j\partial^k)\partial^i \psi

Now, in the sum over k,j the term in brackets is anti-symmetric but so is \epsilon_{ijk} so I don't see why this should vanish.

Any help would be appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Woops \epsilon_{ijk} is symmetric in j,k since \epsilon^{ijk} is anti-symmetric.

Edit: Hang on, \epsilon_{ijk} should still be anti-symmetric, just differing in sign from \epsilon^{ijk}. I still don't see why this should vanish?
 
Last edited:
Presumably \partial^j \partial k^k is symmetric in j,k.
 
Sorry I didn't understand what you wrote. Are you suggesting something along these lines?

\epsilon_{ijk}\gamma^k\partial^j = -\epsilon_{ikj}\gamma^k\partial^j = -\epsilon_{ijk}\gamma^j\partial^k.

Therefore

\epsilon_{ijk}(\gamma^k\partial^j - \gamma^j\partial^k)\partial^i\psi = -4\epsilon_{ijk}\gamma^j\partial^k\partial^i\psi.

But

\epsilon_{ijk} is anti-symmetric in i,k whereas \partial^i\partial^k is symmetric in i,k. Therefore each term in the sum over j vanishes.
 
Last edited:
Um, yes... each term actually vanishes separately, the gamma matrix is simply along for the ride.
 
You'll find it much easier to work directly with standard Dirac solutions in two component form, which are built around the helicity operator. Or look up the angular momentum operator -- see, for example, F. Gross's Relativistic Quantum Mechanics and Field Theory.

Helicity, with a fixed direction of course, commutes with free Hamiltonians for any spin. This is the basis for the elegant Jacob and Wick formalism -- something every particle physicist should master.
Regards,
Reilly Atkinson
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K