Question on commutativity of operators

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mnb96
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operators
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the commutativity of operators, specifically examining the condition under which a unitary operator f and a binary linear operator g satisfy the equation f(g(a,b)) = g(f(a),f(b)). The participants clarify that g is a convolution operator defined by linearity conditions. It is concluded that without knowing the specific nature of g, one cannot definitively determine the necessary and/or sufficient conditions for the equality f(a * b) = f(a) * f(b) to hold.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of unitary operators and their properties
  • Knowledge of linear operators and their definitions
  • Familiarity with convolution operations in functional analysis
  • Basic concepts of linearity in mathematical functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of unitary operators in functional analysis
  • Study the implications of linearity in convolution operators
  • Explore the relationship between linear operators and matrix representations
  • Investigate necessary and sufficient conditions for operator commutativity
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of functional analysis, and anyone studying operator theory or convolution operations will benefit from this discussion.

mnb96
Messages
711
Reaction score
5
Hello,

I have an unitary operator f, and another binary linear operator g.
I would like to find out a necessary and/or sufficient condition on f for the following to hold:

[tex]f(g(a,b)) = g(f(a),f(b))[/tex]

Is this always valid when f is linear?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mnb96 said:
Hello,

I have an unitary operator f, and another binary linear operator g.
I would like to find out a necessary and/or sufficient condition on f for the following to hold:

[tex]f(g(a,b)) = g(f(a),f(b))[/tex]

Is this always valid when f is linear?

Hey mnb96.

As a start can you show what the definition of linearity is in your context?

If they are linear operators, they are going to something like matrices, and from this you can probably figure out the exact constraints for your relationship to hold.

So given this, what can you do with this information?
 
Hi Chiro,

when I said that g is linear I meant that the following holds:

1) [itex]g(\lambda a + \mu c, b)=\lambda g(a,b) + \mu g(c,b)[/itex]

2) [itex]g(a, \lambda b + \mu c)=\lambda g(a,b) + \mu g(a,c)[/itex]

In my case, λ and μ are scalars, a,b,c are functions, and to be even more specific g is the convolution operator. So I essentially want to find the necessary and/or sufficient condition(s) on f to have:

[itex]f(a * b) = f(a) * f(b)[/itex]

Now I am actually thinking that perhaps the original question could not be answered if we don't know the exact nature of the operator g (=in our case convolution). Just saying that "g is linear" is probably not sufficient to deduce conditions for which f(a*b)=f(a)*f(b) holds, but I might be wrong.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K