Question on Lie group regular actions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the isomorphism of regular actions of Lie groups, specifically questioning whether "Every regular G-action is isomorphic to the action of G on G given by left multiplication" holds true for Lie groups. Participants clarify that the definition of isomorphism must adapt when transitioning from groups to topological groups, emphasizing the necessity of continuity in mappings for Lie group actions. The confusion arises from a statement in Wikipedia regarding the validity of isomorphisms for continuous group actions, which does not apply to Lie groups in the same manner as finite groups.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lie groups and their properties
  • Familiarity with group actions and isomorphisms
  • Knowledge of topological groups and continuity in mappings
  • Basic concepts of homomorphisms in group theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definition and properties of Lie groups
  • Explore the concept of group actions and their classifications
  • Learn about topological groups and the implications of continuity
  • Investigate the differences between algebraic and topological isomorphisms
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in algebraic topology, differential geometry, and representation theory, will benefit from this discussion on the nuances of Lie group actions and isomorphisms.

mnb96
Messages
711
Reaction score
5
Hello,

it is known that "Every regular G-action is isomorphic to the action of G on G given by left multiplication".
Is this true also when G is a Lie group?

There is an ambiguous sentence in Wikipedia that is confusing me. It says: "The above statements about isomorphisms for regular, free and transitive actions are no longer valid for continuous group actions.". This sentence probably refers to the above statement about the isomorphism of regular actions and the action of G on itself, but I don't understand why it is supposed to be true for Lie group actions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mnb96 said:
. It says: "The above statements about isomorphisms for regular, free and transitive actions are no longer valid for continuous group actions.".

I'm not an expert on this subject, but I think what happens is that the definition of "Isomorphism" changes when you move from groups to topological groups. The definitions of homomorphisms and isomorphism for a group don't have any requirements about the continuity of the mappings. So the fact that you proved something about a homomorphism for groups doesn't get you a proof of the same theorem for topological groups.

This sentence probably refers to the above statement about the isomorphism of regular actions and the action of G on itself, but I don't understand why it is supposed to be true for Lie group actions.

It's hard to interpret your sentence! When you say "it is supposed to be true for Lie Group actions", what does that mean?
 
Hi Stephen!

thanks for your reply. You are right! I didn't think that in the context of Lie groups we have to change the definition of isomorphism and impose some constraints of continuity on the mapping.
This basically answers my question.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K