Question on whether positron/Down Quark can be fused.

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter 42supernerd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quark
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential interactions between positrons, which are antimatter particles, and down quarks, which are regular matter particles. Participants explore whether these interactions could lead to energy release and if they could be classified as fusion or fission reactions. The scope includes theoretical considerations of particle interactions and the nature of matter-antimatter reactions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions if positrons and down quarks can be fused to release energy, suggesting a possible connection to fusion or fission reactions.
  • Another participant clarifies that positrons annihilate electrons and that down quarks would annihilate anti-down quarks, indicating that matter-antimatter reactions are distinct from fusion or fission.
  • A participant mentions that a positron could be captured by an anti-proton to form an anti-neutron, releasing a photon, but emphasizes that the proposed reactions do not fit the definitions of fusion or fission.
  • It is noted that free quarks cannot exist independently and are typically found in pairs or triples within mesons or nucleons.
  • One participant introduces the possibility of a reaction involving a positron and a down quark leading to an electron-antineutrino and an up quark through weak interaction, asserting that this is not an annihilation process.
  • Another participant speculates about the implications of such reactions on protons and the potential for energy release, suggesting that mesons could annihilate and affect larger atomic structures.
  • A later reply indicates that if a neutron is transformed into a proton, the atomic number increases, and the new nucleus may follow the rules for stability, implying that such processes are not uncommon.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of the interactions between positrons and down quarks, with some proposing specific reactions and others challenging the classification of these reactions as fusion or fission. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these interactions.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for clarity in definitions regarding fusion and fission, as well as the conditions under which certain particle interactions occur. There is also mention of the limitations regarding the existence of free quarks and the stability of resulting nuclei.

42supernerd
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I was wondering that if positrons are antimatter and Down Quarks which are regular could be pushed together so that they break down into energy? The second question is whether this could be used for a form of fusion or fission reaction which ever is more accurate in this case by breaking a proton into 2 high energy free quarks and the energy of the first reaction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF;
if positrons are antimatter and Down Quarks which are regular could be pushed together so that they break down into energy?
I'd be surprised - positrons annihilate electrons. A down-quark would annihilate an anti-down quark.

Technically a positron could get captured by an anti-proton to make an anti-neutron, releasing a photon.

For a reaction to count as fission you have to end up with at least two nuclei, to count as fusion you have to start with at least two nuclei and end uo with at least one bigger one. Your examples don't count as either since they don't involve nuclei at all.
In general, matter-antimatter reactions are neither fusion nor fission - they are their own kind of reaction called "annihilation".

You do not get "free quarks" - at best you can have them in pairs as mesons, triples as nucleons, or as a quark-gluon plasma.
Ejection of a meson from a nucleus is possible but iirc is never spontaneous - something else has to happen too.

Does that answer your questions?
 
Last edited:
yes that does thanks.
 
The reaction positron + down-quark to electron-antineutrino + up-quark is possible via the weak interaction. This is not an annihilation process, but it could transform a neutron into a proton.
 
So if that is what happens to a neutron then what about the proton wouldn't it then be broken apart and the mesons annihilate giving of energy that would ether break apart an atom of large size or escape into its surroundings.
 
If that (positron+down-quark) happens to a neutron in an atom, then the atomic number goes up one. The new nucleus follows the rules for that atom. if it turns out to be unstable then it decays normally. This sort of thing happens all the time.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K