Questions about making galinstan

  • Thread starter Thread starter artis
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the composition and properties of galinstan, a liquid metal alloy made from gallium, indium, and tin. Participants explore the effects of varying the proportions of these metals on the melting point and wetting properties of the mixture, as well as the potential use of additives to modify these characteristics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the effects of changing the proportions of gallium, indium, and tin on the melting point and wetting properties of galinstan.
  • Another participant suggests that a phase diagram for the eutectic mixture would provide relevant information, noting that deviations from the exact composition would likely result in a higher melting point.
  • A participant shares their experience of making galinstan at home, noting that it remains liquid at room temperature but has unexpected adhesion to various surfaces, contrasting it with mercury's non-wetting properties.
  • Some participants discuss the wetting behavior of galinstan, confirming that it wets glass and suggesting that commercial galinstan may contain additives to reduce adhesion.
  • There is a mention of the inertness of mercury as a factor in its non-wetting behavior, with some participants discussing the implications of surface energy and contact angles in relation to wetting.
  • One participant expresses interest in experimenting with galinstan and graphite to observe its wetting properties.
  • Suggestions are made regarding the use of graphite lubricants to minimize contamination during experiments.
  • A participant proposes silanizing glassware as a potential treatment to alter its interaction with galinstan.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the composition of galinstan affects its properties, but there are multiple competing views on the specifics of wetting behavior and the role of additives. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the precise effects of different compositions and treatments.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the challenges of maintaining constant temperature during the cooling process of galinstan and the complexities of surface interactions, but these aspects are not fully resolved within the discussion.

artis
Messages
1,479
Reaction score
977
Hi, I have the 3 essential metals needed to make galinstan, namely Gallium , Indium and tin, I also read the typical proportions percentage wise that each of the elements must have for given weight of final mixture.
The quoted percentages are 68.5% Ga, 21.5% In, and 10.0% Sn by weight,

my question is what changes in the final mixture if those parts are mixed in differently , I would assume the melting point either goes up or down , etc,
also what extra additives would be necessary to make the melting point lower or maybe increase the non wetting properties?

Basically any good insight would be appreciated.
thanks.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
The information you are looking for is a phase diagram for the eutectic mixture.

Yes, if you don't hit the exact composition, melting point will be higher. Additives will change the melting temperature as well.

Technically it should be possible to start with any composition - when you slowly cool it down some of the mixture will solidify, and the remaining liquid will have its composition closer and close to the eutectic. At some point you should have just the liquid eutectic mixed with solids that - at least in theory - can be separated. That will be very difficult, as keeping everything in a constant temperature during such operation is quite a challenge.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim mcnamara
I made at home some 150 grams of galinstan in the proportions given over in the internet.
My mixture stays liquid at room temp, so I suppose I have done everything correctly, although there is a disappointment , it seems like the galinstan mixture has rather good adhesion to many surfaces , in other words it wets to surfaces such as ceramic, glass, stainless steel etc.
I have worked with mercury before and mercury was perfect in this regard, it was always very smooth and never wet any surface ,

now does galinstan does this or is it just that commercial high grade galinstan has some extra additives that make it less adhesive and less wetting to surfaces?
 
artis said:
now does galinstan does this or is it just that commercial high grade galinstan has some extra additives that make it less adhesive and less wetting to surfaces?
Yes galinstan wets glass. Mercury doesn’t, mainly because of its insanely high surface energy (in other words, air wets glass more effectively than mercury does).
 
TeethWhitener said:
Yes galinstan wets glass. Mercury doesn’t, mainly because of its insanely high surface energy (in other words, air wets glass more effectively than mercury does).
It is alleged that it is more because of the inertness of mercury. When oxygen is thoroughly excluded, galinstan does become less adhesive.
In presence of air, surfaces which galinstan does not wet are said to include teflon and graphite.
 
snorkack said:
It is alleged that it is more because of the inertness of mercury.

The two aren’t mutually exclusive. Contact angle is determined by Young’s equation. The surface energy terms in that equation are determined by the microscopic details of the surfaces.

It’s not particularly surprising that galinstan doesn’t wet Teflon (I’ve never tried), but I know for a fact that galinstan will wet graphene (graphite’s surface energy can behave differently from graphene).
 
well since I have some galinstan I can try the trick with graphite from commutator brushes and see what happens
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim mcnamara
Yup. That is how you do it. You may want to buy one of those tiny "squirt" bottles of graphite that is used lubricate exterior keyholes, e.g., automobiles. That way, you reduce potential contamination. Cheaply.
 
You might consider silanizing the glassware to see if that treatment would work.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
10K
Replies
12
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K