Questions About Prisms - Refractive Index & Parallelograms

  • Thread starter Thread starter Misr
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
Cryolite is suggested for covering prism faces due to its refractive index being higher than air but lower than glass, which minimizes light loss during entry and exit. Parallelograms do not disperse light because they function as two symmetric reverse prisms, canceling out dispersion effects. The angle of light entry and exit significantly influences its deviation from the original path. In contrast to triangular prisms, where the entry and exit angles differ, parallelograms maintain parallel sides, allowing light to converge without dispersion. The discussion emphasizes the importance of refractive indices and geometry in understanding light behavior in prisms.
Misr
Messages
384
Reaction score
0
1-the faces of the prism should be covered with cryolite because the refractive index of cryolite is more than that of air and less than that of glass,so the loss of incident rays could be avoided on entering or leaving the prism.

2-A parallelogram doesn't disperse light because it works as two symmetric reverse prisms so the dispersion caused by one of them is canceled by the other


I don't understand all of this.Do u have a better explanation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When light enters or exits something, the angle of entry or exit determines how far it will deviate from it's original path. A parallelogram has parallel opposite sides, so when the light enters it's path is altered a certain amount and when it exits the the mediums are arranged oppositely than entry (going from glass to air instead of air to glass) and the light is refracted opposite the direction that it entered at and ends up converging on itself again. When entering a triangular prism, the entry and exit sides are not parallel to each other, so when the light exits the far side it is refracted in a way that causes the different wavelengths of light to separate and disperse.

That's not a technical description, but I think it is pretty much correct.
 
That's a very good answer,
I hope to find an answer to my first question
Thanks very much
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
15K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K