Questions regarding exotic weaponry based in the new physics .

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Max Faust
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the exploration of exotic weaponry based on "the new physics," specifically regarding claims of a new generation of nuclear weaponry being researched. Participants express skepticism about the credibility of the Pravda article, suggesting it contains elements of truth mixed with misinformation. The gamma amplifier, linked to the stimulated emission of gamma rays from hafnium-178 isomers, is identified as a legitimate concept worth investigating, despite its theoretical and experimental challenges. Relevant academic references are provided for further exploration of this topic.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nuclear physics concepts, particularly related to gamma emissions.
  • Familiarity with hafnium-178 isomer and its properties.
  • Knowledge of theoretical and experimental physics methodologies.
  • Ability to critically evaluate scientific literature and sources.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "stimulated emission of gamma rays" and its implications in weaponry.
  • Investigate the "hafnium-178 isomer" and its potential applications in nuclear technology.
  • Examine the theoretical challenges discussed in "Induced gamma emission: Hafnium controversy."
  • Review experimental findings from "PRL" and "PRC" regarding gamma amplification.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, defense researchers, and anyone interested in the implications of advanced nuclear technologies and their theoretical foundations.

Max Faust
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
Questions regarding exotic weaponry based in "the new physics".

http://english.pravda.ru/science/19/94/379/12737_weapons.html"

I stumbled upon a strange article in Pravda.

I would be grateful if anyone with some real insight into these issues would comment on the content of this article, which seems to suggest that "a new generation" of nuclear weaponry is currently being researched.

Is this by and large BS or does the author of this article make sense?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


Max Faust said:
http://english.pravda.ru/science/19/94/379/12737_weapons.html"

I stumbled upon a strange article in Pravda.

I would be grateful if anyone with some real insight into these issues would comment on the content of this article, which seems to suggest that "a new generation" of nuclear weaponry is currently being researched.

Is this by and large BS or does the author of this article make sense?

Of course, as with any conspiration, if it is sufficiently secret, it will appear as BS. Any statement based upon a hypothesis of sufficient secrecy is non-falsifiable.

My guess is that most of what is written there is essentially crackpot rubbish (but then, who knows :shy: ), with some small elements of truth in there. The gamma amplifier is indeed a hypothetical possibility based upon a possibly genuine physical effect (but which has nothing to do with false vacuums, dark energy or whatever).

It has to do with stimulated emission of gamma rays from a hafnium-178 isomer.

There is a wiki entry on it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Induced_gamma_emission:_Hafnium_controversy

but I don't know myself how reliable that Wiki is, so don't take it as a peer-reviewed source, but it can be a starting point for eventual investigations if you're interested.

There has been some theoretical difficulty with it:
http://prc.aps.org/abstract/PRC/v71/i2/e024606

Also, experimentally, things aren't that clear:
http://prl.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v87/i7/e072503

I'm no expert on it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
606
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
12K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
9K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K