Radioisotopes and the Age of the Earth (criticism?)

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Disputed
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Age Earth
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the critical analysis of the works produced by the group associated with "Radioisotopes and the Age of the Earth." Participants are exploring whether any official scientific reviews or critiques exist regarding their publications, particularly in peer-reviewed journals.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a desire to find critical analyses of the group's work, questioning the existence of official reviews by scientists.
  • Another participant asks for clarification on what specific submissions are being referenced and whether they have been published in peer-reviewed journals.
  • A participant lists specific publications related to the group's arguments and expresses skepticism about their peer-reviewed status, noting a lack of found critiques or discussions by scientists.
  • A suggestion is made to refer to a RationalWiki page that lists assertions and refutations related to the group's claims.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not appear to reach a consensus on the existence of peer-reviewed critiques or the publication status of the group's work. Multiple viewpoints regarding the availability and credibility of critiques remain present.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the peer-reviewed status of the group's publications and the existence of formal critiques, indicating a potential limitation in available information.

Disputed
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Okay, first off I'm not starting a debate here

But I am debating with a friend, and I wanted to know if there is any critical analysis done on the various papers and books produced by this group (Radioisotopes and the Age of the Earth).

In my quick searches I've mainly found blogs and such, but I was wondering if any official scientist or body had reviewed their submissions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Disputed said:
In my quick searches I've mainly found blogs and such, but I was wondering if any official scientist or body had reviewed their submissions.

What submissions? Have they published anything in a peer reviewed journal?
 
I'm only aware of their published stuff such as

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0890514410/?tag=pfamazon01-20

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B000VL8V1S/?tag=pfamazon01-20

and their basic arguments

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creation_geophysics

I'm just wondering if any scientist at all, even in a small article, has discussed their research and "publishings" if not submissions. I'm guessing they haven't tried to submit anything to peer reviewed science journals. In my searching for stuff I haven't found much either showing they've published peer reviewed stuff or official criticisms, I was just wondering if anyone had seen some.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
442
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K