Radioisotopes and the Age of the Earth (criticism?)

[Disputed]

Okay, first off I'm not starting a debate here

But I am debating with a friend, and I wanted to know if there is any critical analysis done on the various papers and books produced by this group (Radioisotopes and the Age of the Earth).

In my quick searches I've mainly found blogs and such, but I was wondering if any official scientist or body had reviewed their submissions.

 

[Vanadium 50]

In my quick searches I've mainly found blogs and such, but I was wondering if any official scientist or body had reviewed their submissions.

What submissions? Have they published anything in a peer reviewed journal?

 

[Disputed]

I'm only aware of their published stuff such as

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0890514410/?tag=pfamazon01-20

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B000VL8V1S/?tag=pfamazon01-20

and their basic arguments

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creation_geophysics

I'm just wondering if any scientist at all, even in a small article, has discussed their research and "publishings" if not submissions. I'm guessing they haven't tried to submit anything to peer reviewed science journals. In my searching for stuff I haven't found much either showing they've published peer reviewed stuff or official criticisms, I was just wondering if anyone had seen some.

 

[heatheramara]

Check out the rational wiki page for a list of assertions and refutations:
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/RATE

 

[pmacias]

I can understand your curiosity about the validity of the claims made by the group Radioisotopes and the Age of the Earth. It is always important to critically analyze and review the work of any scientific group or individual.

To answer your question, there have been several critical analyses and reviews of the group's papers and books by other scientists and scientific bodies. One notable example is a review by the National Center for Science Education, which concluded that the group's claims are not supported by the scientific evidence and that their arguments are based on flawed assumptions and misunderstandings of radiometric dating.

Additionally, many scientific organizations, such as the American Geophysical Union and the Geological Society of America, have also released statements refuting the claims made by the group and reaffirming the scientific consensus on the age of the Earth.

It is important to note that the scientific community operates on a peer-review process, where research is thoroughly evaluated and critiqued by other experts in the field before being published. This ensures that any flaws or biases in the research are identified and addressed.

In conclusion, there has been critical analysis and review of the work produced by Radioisotopes and the Age of the Earth group by other scientists and scientific organizations. It is always important to approach any scientific claims with a critical mindset and to rely on evidence-based research supported by the scientific community.