MHB Radius of Sphere Inscribed in Square Pyramid: Michelle's Q&A

MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

How would you find the radius of a sphere inscribed in a square pyramid?

So we got a problem in Geo today and we don't know how to solve it.
So what we got is:
-A pyramid with a square base
-a sphere inscribed in the pyramid
-base edge of 10
-slant height of 10

Please explain how to find the radius and of the sphere! Thanks!

I have posted a link there to this thread so the OP can view my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Michelle,

The sphere will be tangent to the sides of the pyramid along the slant heights. Here is a diagram of a cross section of the pyramid and the sphere through the center of the sphere and long one of the two lines of bilateral symmetry for the square base (i.e. containing two opposing slant heights of the sides):

View attachment 2168

We know the cross-section of the pyramid is an equilateral triangle having side lengths 10, and the cross-section of the sphere is a circle having the radius of the sphere. From the diagram, we see that we may state:

$$\tan\left(30^{\circ} \right)=\frac{r}{5}$$

Hence:

$$r=5\tan\left(30^{\circ} \right)=\frac{5}{\sqrt{3}}=\frac{5}{3}\sqrt{3}$$
 

Attachments

  • michelle.jpg
    michelle.jpg
    5 KB · Views: 115
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top