Raising and lowering operators on a ket?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter philip041
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operators
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of the S(+) and S(-) operators on integer kets such as |1>, |-1>, and |0> within the context of quantum mechanics. It is established that operating with S(+) on |+1> results in zero for S = 1 states, while S(-) on |-1> also yields zero. The operators are confirmed to function similarly across different types of angular momentum, with the relevant matrices being 3x3 for S = 1 states. The conversation also clarifies the relationship between angular momentum quantum number j and its z-projections m_j, emphasizing that for j = 1/2, the possible values of m_j are -1/2 and +1/2.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically angular momentum
  • Familiarity with the mathematical representation of quantum states (kets)
  • Knowledge of operator theory in quantum mechanics
  • Basic grasp of the concepts of spin and its quantum numbers
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical framework of angular momentum in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the representation of quantum operators as matrices
  • Explore the implications of spin states in quantum mechanics
  • Research the relationship between quantum numbers j and m_j in detail
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, physicists working with angular momentum, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of quantum state manipulation.

philip041
Messages
104
Reaction score
0
How do you use the S(+) and S(-) operators on integer kets, |1>, |-1>, |0>?

I'm told the outcome of the ones which aren't zero will be something like h(bar)/sqrt(2) * |ket>

Confused!? I thought operators are 2 x 2 matrices...

Any help much appreciated,

Philip
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Operating with S+ on |+1> Will give you Zero if you are operating on S = 1 states.. you are not so clear in your question here, but I assume you have S = 1 states here..

Operating with S- on |-1> = 0 as well.

Operating with S- on |0> you use formulas:

http://www.mt.luth.se/~nikle/Education/MTF067/Lectures/PL13.pdf

(just replace L with S , these operators work the same no matter what kind of angular momentum you have)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
And since you have S = 1 states here, you should have a 3x3 matrix
 
Cheers for the answer, I have a question though:

In the third slide you posted, what does the l = 3 correspond to? The question I am looking at says for spin 1. What is l and what is m. Should my l in the examples always be 1, as they are spin 1, and my m be either -1, 0 or 1?
 
yes :-)
 
cool, so if it were for spin 1/2, would l = 1/2 and m = 1/2, 0 or 1/2?
 
No, think! For a spin 1/2 particle, which possible z-projections exists? What is the general relation for an Angularmomentum J and its z-projections m_J ?
 
none?
 
Given an angular momentum j, which can have values: 0,1/2 ,1, 3/2 ,2 ,5/2, ...

the z-component, m_j, can obtain values: m_j = -j, -j +1, \ldots , j-1, j

So if j = 1/2, what possible values can you have of the z-component? ;-)
 
  • #10
-5/2 to 5/2, why didn't i say that the first time? sorry for being dim
 
  • #11
philip041 said:
-5/2 to 5/2, why didn't i say that the first time? sorry for being dim

No you must have missunderstood. In your case, j = 1/2, what values of m_j can you have?
 
  • #12
no that's wrong
 
  • #13
-3/2 3/2

miss print
 
  • #14
philip041 said:
-3/2 3/2

miss print

now you are REALLY making a fool out of yourself ;-)

If j = 1/2 and the general "formula" for possible m_j's for a given j are -j, -j+1, .. ,j -1, j

What values of m_j can you have for j = 1/2 ?
 
  • #15
3/2 to 3/2?
 
  • #16
missed out the minus by mistake.
 
  • #17
philip041 said:
3/2 to 3/2?

are you guessing or using the formula?

if you are guessing, stop doing that and apply formula.

if you use formula, tell me how you do it, you are doing something REALLY wrong.

According to formula, for a given j, the maximum m_j is j, and the minumum is -j.
 
  • #18
malawi_glenn;2001489 If j = 1/2 and the general "formula" for possible m_j's for a given j are -j said:
1/2 and -1/2
 
  • #19
philip041 said:
1/2 and -1/2

good :-)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K