Raising and Lowering Operators

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dFrankCalc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operators
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the raising and lowering operators in quantum mechanics, specifically the S+ operator. The user successfully calculated the S+ operator as hbar*sqrt(2)*[0,1,0;0,0,1;0,0,0] but identified an inconsistency with a factor of sqrt(2). The factor's origin is questioned, with a suggestion that normalization may be the issue. The Sz eigenstates used in the calculation are confirmed to be properly normalized.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with raising and lowering operators
  • Knowledge of eigenstates and normalization
  • Basic linear algebra concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of raising and lowering operators in quantum mechanics
  • Study normalization techniques for quantum states
  • Explore the role of factors in operator calculations
  • Learn about the implications of eigenstate normalization on quantum mechanics problems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, particularly those working on operator theory and eigenstate normalization.

dFrankCalc
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am working on a homework problem from quantum mechanics. In order to solve the problem I need to derive the raising and lowering operators.

In order to to this I did the following:

S+operator = <1,i | S+operator | 1,j > where i = 1, 0, -1 with i = 1 corresponding to row one etc. I let j = 1, 0, -1 , corresponding to the columns where j = 1 is column one.

I was able to calculate every thing the same as what the book has i.e.
S+operator =hbar*sqrt(2)*[0,1,0;0,0,1; 0,0,0] except I am off by a factor of sqrt(2). Where does this factor come from?



DFrankCalc
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Normalization probably. Are the eigenstates of your operator normalized if needed?
 
The Sz eigen states that I used to get S+ are properly normalized.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K