Undergrad Raising and Lowering Operators

  • Thread starter Thread starter aliens123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operators
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The raising and lowering operators in a spin 1/2 system, denoted as \(S_+\) and \(S_-\), include a factor of \(\hbar\) as defined in Sakurai's 2017 edition. The operators are expressed as \(S_+ \equiv \hbar | + \rangle \langle - |\) and \(S_- \equiv \hbar | - \rangle \langle + |\). This factor is crucial for maintaining the dimensional consistency of angular momentum operators, which are defined as \(\hat{S}_{\pm}=\hat{S}_x \pm \mathrm{i} \hat{S}_y\). The normalization of eigenvectors further cancels one factor of \(\hbar\), ensuring that the physical interpretation aligns with the quantum mechanical framework.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically spin 1/2 systems
  • Familiarity with angular momentum operators in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of normalization of quantum states
  • Basic grasp of the role of \(\hbar\) in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and properties of angular momentum operators in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the normalization process of quantum states and its implications
  • Explore the physical significance of \(\hbar\) in quantum systems
  • Investigate the mathematical framework of raising and lowering operators in various quantum systems
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and researchers focusing on spin systems and angular momentum in quantum theory will benefit from this discussion.

aliens123
Messages
75
Reaction score
5
Why is it that the raising and lowering operators in a spin 1/2 system have a factor of $\hbar ?$

From Sakurai:
$$S_+ \equiv \hbar | + \rangle \langle - |, S_- \equiv \hbar | - \rangle \langle + |$$

"So the physical interpretation of $S_+$ is that it raises the component by one unit of $\hbar ? $ " (Page 22, 2017 edition).

But it seems like this does not raise the spin component by one unit of $\hbar. $ If I have a vector in the state $|- \rangle $ then
$$S_z |- \rangle = (-\hbar /2) | - \rangle$$
But now if I look at:
$$S_z S_+ |- \rangle = (\hbar^2 /2) | + \rangle$$
This didn't raise the spin component by one unit of $hbar.$ But if $S_+$ weren't defined with that factor of $\hbar,$ then it would have raised the factor by one unit of $hbar.$
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Just divide by the constant then, it’s defined that way since the raising and lowering operators take simple forms.
 
Usually the raising- and loweing-operators of angular momentum operators are defined in terms of the angular-momentum components,
$$\hat{S}_{\pm}=\hat{S}_x \pm \mathrm{i} \hat{S}_y.$$
Thus it has dimensions of angular momentum, which is where the factors ##\hbar## come from in the OP.

Of course, you have to normalize the eigenvectors, which cancels one factor ##\hbar## again.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
944
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K