First realize that "raising" and "lowering" of indices are really just shortcuts:
Given v^a, then v_b \equiv v^a g_{ab}.
So, the real object is v^a g_{ab}, but it gets tiring to write that all of the time.
So, a convention is adopted to define the shortcut v_b.
So, v^a g_{ab}=v^a f_{ab}+v^a h_{ab}.
Which term do want to declare a shortcut for?The following references suggest
using the "background" unperturbed metric (in your notation, f_{ab}).From the following reference, a scan of Geroch's 1972 General Relativity notes [maybe posted by Ashtekar?]
http://www.gravity.psu.edu/links/general_relativity_notes.pdfSee Section 39. Linearization (page 143 [pdf page 145]).
On page 144 [pdf page 146] between equations (156) and (157), Geroch declares
Geroch said:
We shall hereafter raise and lower indices with g_{ab}, the unperturbed metric".
which makes sense because your unperturbed metric likely corresponds to an exact solution [not necessarily Minkowski] that you know about, rather than some perturbed-metric.
However, the notation in those notes might be a little confusing since
in the first paragraph of that section,
he started by writing g_{ab}=\eta_{ab}+\gamma_{ab} as an example when perturbing from Minkowski spacetime.
But between equations (153) and (154), he essentially does the following:
Using a family of metrics g_{ab}(\lambda), where \lambda \in[0,1)
the perturbed metric is [in general]
<br />
\begin{align*}<br />
g_{ab}(\lambda)<br />
&=<br />
\left(g_{ab}(\lambda)\right|_{\lambda=0}+\lambda\ \frac{d}{d\lambda}\left(g_{ab}(\lambda)\right|_{\lambda=0}\\<br />
&=<br />
g_{ab}(0)+\lambda\ \frac{d}{d\lambda}\left(g_{ab}(\lambda)\right|_{\lambda=0}<br />
\end{align*}<br />
in terms of the unperturbed metric g_{ab}(0) (which he now calls "g_{ab}" ... between (153) and (154).)
For another reference, look at Wald's text [which is influenced by Geroch, as noted in the preface]
- Section 4.4 Linearized Gravity: The Newtonian Limit and Gravitational Radiation,
Wald said:
g_{ab} =\eta_{ab} + \gamma_{ab}
...
In order not to have \gamma_{ab} hidden in a raised or lowered index,
it is convenient to raise and lower tensor indices with \eta_{ab} and \eta^{ab} rather than g_{ab} and g^{ab} . We will adopt this notational convention for the remainder of this section with one exception :
The tensor g^{ab} itself will still denote the inverse metric, not \eta^{ac}\eta^{bd}g_{cd}. It should be noted that in the linear
approximation we have
g^{ab}= \eta^{ab} -\gamma^{ab} (4 .4 .2)
since the composition of the right-hand sides of equations (4 .4.1) and (4 .4 .2) differs
from the identity operator only by terms quadratic in \gamma_{ab}.
- Section 7.5 on Perturbations,
Wald said:
g_{ab} = {}^0 g_{ab}+\gamma_{ab}
...
(between Eq 7.5.14 and 7.5.15)
Since all quantities aside from \gamma_{ab}, now refer only to the background metric {}^0 g_{ab}, we
shall in the following drop the superscript zero on the background metric and its
derivative operator, and we shall use the background metric g_{ab} and its inverse g^{ab} to raise and lower indices.