Raising the ladder operators to a power

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the mathematical problem of raising the operator X, defined as X = ((ħ/(2mω))^(1/2) (a + a+)), to the fifth power. The user seeks a method to simplify the computation without iterating through all possible combinations of the raising (a+) and lowering (a) operators. The solution involves applying Wick's theorem, which transforms the problem into a combinatorial one, significantly easing the calculation of expectation values in quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically harmonic oscillators
  • Familiarity with raising and lowering operators (a and a+)
  • Knowledge of Wick's theorem and its application in quantum field theory
  • Basic combinatorial mathematics for simplifying operator products
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Wick's theorem in detail to understand its applications in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the properties and applications of raising and lowering operators in quantum harmonic oscillators
  • Explore combinatorial techniques for simplifying operator products in quantum mechanics
  • Review examples of expectation value calculations using Wick's theorem
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, physicists working with harmonic oscillators, and anyone interested in simplifying calculations involving operator algebra in quantum field theory.

MooshiS
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Hi! I am working on homework and came across this problem:

<n|X5|n>

I know X = ((ħ/(2mω))1/2 (a + a+))

And if I raise X to the 5th, its becomes X5 = ((ħ/(2mω))5/2 (a + a+)5)

What I'm wondering is, is there anyway to be able to solve this without going through all of the iterations the raising and lowering operators will create being raised to the 5th power? Or will I just have to tackle every strain this will produce?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One thing you might notice is that only terms with equal numbers of ##a^+## and ##a## will be non zero.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MooshiS
Paul Colby said:
One thing you might notice is that only terms with equal numbers of ##a^+## and ##a## will be non zero.
XD Oh man, thanks, that actually makes this problem a cakewalk
 
Even more generally, there is something called Wick's theorem which is invaluable to computing these sorts of expectation values. It essentially uses the trick pointed out by Paul Colby, but more explicitly reduces computing harmonic oscillator expectation values to a combinatorics problem (rather than laboriously doing all the commutations).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K