Raising to the power of 0 or 1

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter blueridge
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Explanation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical concepts of raising numbers and variables to the powers of zero and one. Participants seek explanations for why any nonzero number raised to the power of zero equals one, and why any number raised to the power of one equals itself. The scope includes theoretical reasoning and conceptual clarification.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that for nonzero ##a##, ##a^0=1## can be derived from the property of exponents, specifically using the equation $$\frac{a^n}{a^n}=a^{n-n}=a^0.$$
  • Others mention that for any ##a##, ##a^1=a## can similarly be shown through the relationship $$a^1\cdot a^1=a^{1+1}=a^2.$$
  • Several participants express a desire for a non-textbook explanation of why these properties hold, indicating a preference for intuitive reasoning over formal definitions.
  • One participant introduces the concept of an empty product, suggesting that ##a^0## is defined as the neutral element of multiplication, which is ##1##.
  • Another participant discusses the inductive definition of exponents, illustrating how the properties can be derived step by step.
  • Some participants question the implications of defining these properties differently, suggesting that it could affect the validity of exponent laws.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the definitions of ##a^0## and ##a^1##, but there is no consensus on the best way to explain these concepts. Multiple viewpoints and methods of reasoning are presented, indicating an ongoing debate about the underlying principles.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion regarding the definitions and implications of exponentiation, particularly when considering alternative definitions that could affect established exponent laws.

blueridge
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
I know that any number (except for zero), any variable and any term raised to the zero power is 1. I don't know the reason why this is true. Can someone explain why?

Samples:

59^0 = 1

R^0 = 1

(a + b)^0 = 1
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I know that any number, any variable and any term raised to the first power equals itself. I don't know the reason why this is true. Can someone explain why?

Samples of what I mean:

45^1 = 45

x^1 = x

(y + 3)^1 = y + 3
 
Moderator's note: I have merge the two questions because they are closely related.
 
DrClaude said:
Moderator's note: I have merge the two questions because they are closely related.
Ok.
 
For nonzero ##a##, ##a^0=1##, because
$$\frac{a^n}{a^n}=a^{n-n}=a^0.$$

For any ##a##, ##a^1=a##, because
$$a^1\cdot a^1=a^{1+1}=a^2.$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970, blueridge and mcastillo356
docnet said:
For nonzero ##a##, ##a^0=1##, because
$$\frac{a^n}{a^n}=a^{n-n}=a^0.$$

For any ##a##, ##a^1=a##, because
$$a^1\cdot a^1=a^{1+1}=a^2.$$
Can you explain in words why a^0 = 1 and a^1 = a? Your reply is a textbook definition. I can look it up myself. Know what I mean?
 
Last edited:
##a^n## is 1 multiplied by ##a## ##n## times. When ##n=0##, that is just 1. When ##n=1##, that is ##1 \cdot a = a##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: blueridge and Mayhem
blueridge said:
Can you explain in words why a^0 = 1 and a^1 = a? Your reply is a textbook definition. I can look it up myself. Know what I mean?

If we don't define them that way (and also define a^{-1} = 1/a) the index law a^{n+m} = a^na^m does not hold for all integer n and m.[/i]
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: blueridge
FactChecker said:
##a^n## is 1 multiplied by ##a## ##n## times. When ##n=0##, that is just 1. When ##n=1##, that is ##1 \cdot a = a##.
Does this also apply to numbers and terms?

For example, 5^0 = 1 and 5^1 = 5.
Another example is (a + b)^0 = 1 and (a + b)^1 = a + b.

Yes?
 
  • #10
pasmith said:
If we don't define them that way (and also define a^{-1} = 1/a) the index law a^{n+m} = a^na^m does not hold for all integer n and m.[/i]
What do you mean if we don't define them that way?
 
  • #11
blueridge said:
59^0 = 1
blueridge said:
Does this also apply to numbers and terms?

For example, 5^0 = 1
Huh? You are asking us what you say you already know.
 
  • #12
Vanadium 50 said:
Huh? You are asking us what you say you already know.
I am asking for a clear, concise, to the core explanation of why a^0 = 1 and a^1 = a. This is all I am asking. This is not an abstract algebra problem.
 
  • #13
blueridge said:
What do you mean if we don't define them that way?
He means if we define them a different way.

blueridge said:
I can look it up myself. Know what I mean?
Don't be rude.

Let's try again from the start.

You know that ## a^3 = a(a^2) ## and ## a^4 = a(a^3) ##, yes? These are just examples of a general definition (an inductive definition) ## a^n = a(a^{n-1}) ##: in the first example we have used ## n = 3 ## and in the second example ## n = 4 ##.

Now what happens if we take ## n = 2 ##?
$$ \begin{align}
\nonumber a^2 =&\ a(a^{2-1})\\
\nonumber a^2 =&\ a(a^1)\\
\nonumber \frac{a^2}a =&\ \frac{a(a^1)}a \\
\nonumber \left( \frac a a \right)a =&\ \left( \frac a a \right) a^1 \\
\nonumber a =&\ a^1 \\
\nonumber a^1 =&\ a
\end{align}
$$

Now you try this taking ## n = 1 ##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and blueridge
  • #14
pbuk said:
He means if we define them a different way.


Don't be rude.

Let's try again from the start.

You know that ## a^3 = a(a^2) ## and ## a^4 = a(a^3) ##, yes? These are just examples of a general definition (an inductive definition) ## a^n = a(a^{n-1}) ##: in the first example we have used ## n = 3 ## and in the second example ## n = 4 ##.

Now what happens if we take ## n = 2 ##?
$$ \begin{align}
\nonumber a^2 =&\ a(a^{2-1})\\
\nonumber a^2 =&\ a(a^1)\\
\nonumber \frac{a^2}a =&\ \frac{a(a^1)}a \\
\nonumber \left( \frac a a \right)a =&\ \left( \frac a a \right) a^1 \\
\nonumber a =&\ a^1 \\
\nonumber a^1 =&\ a
\end{align}
$$

Now you try this taking ## n = 1 ##.
Perfectly done.
 
  • #15
Or consider: ##a^0 *a^0=a^{0+0}=a^0##. It follows ##a^0=1##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: blueridge
  • #16
WWGD said:
Or consider: ##a^0 *a^0=a^{0+0}=a^0##. It follows ##a^0=1##.
Very good.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD
  • #17
##a^n## is an abbreviation for ##a^n=\underbrace{a\cdot a\ldots a}_{n-times}## so ##a^1=a## and ##a^0## is an empty product and equals the neutral element of multiplication, the ##1.##

The same holds for empty sums that are equal to the neutral element of addition, the ##0.##
$$
\sum_{\substack{k=1\\1\nmid k}}^n k=0
$$
 
  • #18
Thread closed as this new member has been banned.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K