Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Rao: Proposition 1.2.4. Superfluous section of proof?

  1. Jun 19, 2012 #1
    Rao: Topology: Proposition 1.2.4. If (X,T) is a topological space, a subset A of X is closed iff the the derived set of A is a subset of A: [itex]A'\subseteq A[/itex].

    Rao's proof of [itex](A'\subseteq A) \Rightarrow (X\setminus A \in T)[/itex] goes like this:

    To me, this looks like enough to show that [itex](A'\subseteq A) \Rightarrow (X\setminus A \in T)[/itex], since a set A is open iff each of its points belongs to a neighborhood which is a subset of A. So [itex]X\setminus A[/itex] is open. In other words, A is closed.[/QUOTE]

    But Rao goes on:

    This seems superfluous to me. Am I missing something? Why not just say U is the neighborhood of x that's a subset of [itex]X\setminus A[/itex]?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 19, 2012 #2
    Your proof looks fine. What Rao says isn't wrong, but it can be shortened.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Rao: Proposition 1.2.4. Superfluous section of proof?
  1. Conic sections (Replies: 4)

Loading...