Rates of Reaction Problem - Verification

  • Thread starter Thread starter vertciel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reaction
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on verifying the method used to calculate the age of wine based on tritium decay. The correct approach involves determining the number of half-lives needed for the tritium concentration to decrease to 10% of its original value. The user initially miscalculated by raising 12.5 years to an incorrect power, resulting in an unreasonable age of 4404 years. The correct calculation shows that the wine is approximately 41.5 years old, as derived from multiplying the number of half-lives by the half-life duration. The explanation clarifies that multiplying by the number of half-lives is necessary to convert the elapsed half-lives into actual years.
vertciel
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone:

For the following problem, I arrived at the correct answer but am unsure about the method used. Could someone please check my work to see if it is legitimate or if it is a fluke?

Thank you.

---

1. The age of wine can be determined by measuring the trace amount of radioactive tritium, 3H, present in a sample. Tritium gradually diminishes by a first-order radioactive decay with a half-life of 12.5 years. If a bottle of wine is found to have a tritium concentration that is 0.100 that of freshly bottled wine, what is the age of the wine?

---

My Work:

Since it takes 12.5 years for the original sample to reach 50%, I would need to find the number of half-lives needed to reach 10%.

0.5^x = 0.1

x ln 0.5 = ln 0.1

x = \frac{ln 0.1}{ln 0.5}

Originally, I raised 12.5 to the power of
\frac{ln 0.1}{ln 0.5}, but this was incorrect since 4404 years would be unreasonable.

So instead:

12.5 x \frac{ln 0.1}{ln 0.5} = 41.5 years, which is the right answer.

Also, if I am indeed right, could someone please explain why I would multiply by the the number of half-lives?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
x represents the number of half lives elapsed. So, if three half lives have elapsed, 1/8 of the original sample will remain, and (1/2)3 = 1/8. Three half lives corresponds to 12.5 x 3 = 37.5 years, not 12.53 years as the latter calculation makes no sense.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
14K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K