- #1

- 61

- 0

So is it true that X/Y follows a beta distribution?

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter jimmy1
- Start date

- #1

- 61

- 0

So is it true that X/Y follows a beta distribution?

- #2

- 61

- 0

Ok, I found the answer (just had a bit of a brain freeze!!). It is X/(X+Y), and not X/Y

- #3

- 370

- 0

X/Y does follow a beta distribution! (Assuming they have the same second parameter. This is very important). It's called the beta distribution of the second kind with parameters alpha_x and alpha_y. The F distribution is simply b*X/Y where b>0.

I'll show you why X/Y is called the beta distribution of the second kind.

Suppose X~[tex]\Gamma(\alpha_1,\beta)[/tex] and Y~[tex]\Gamma(\alpha_2,\beta)[/tex], X and Y independent. What is the distribution of [tex]U_1=\frac{X}{Y}[/tex]?

Now this is a multivariate transformation, (http://www.ma.ic.ac.uk/~ayoung/m2s1/Multivariatetransformations.PDF see here if you don't know how to do these), so we will use [tex]U_2=Y[/tex] as an auxillary equation.

So, [tex]g_1(x,y)=x/y[/tex] and [tex]g_2(x,y)=y[/tex] where x,y are positive reals (because they come from a gamma distribution) now it should be clear to see that [tex]g_1^{-1}(x,y)=xy[/tex] and [tex]g_2^{-1}(x,y)=y[/tex]. Note how g_1 and g_2 have range (0,+infty).

Therefore, [tex]f_{(U_1,U_2)}(u_1,u_2)=f_{(x,y)}(g_1^{-1}(u_1,u_2),g_2^{-1}(u_1,u_2))|J|[/tex]. As an exercise you can show that [tex]|J|=u_2[/tex]

Since X and Y are independent [tex]f_{(X,Y)}=f_X f_Y[/tex]

Now [tex]f_{(U_1,U_2)}(u_1,u_2)=f_x(u_1u_2)f_y(u_2)u_2=\frac{e^{-\frac{1}{\beta}(1+u_1)u_2}u_1^{\alpha_1-1}u_2^{\alpha_1+\alpha_2-1}}{\beta^{\alpha_1+\alpha_2}\Gamma(\alpha_1)\Gamma(\alpha_2)}[/tex]

(I have done some simplifying)

Now, we don't want the pdf of (U_1,U_2) we want the pdf of U_1, so we integrate over the joint to get the marginal distribution of U_1.

[tex]f_{U_1}(u_1)=\frac{u_1^{\alpha_1-1}}{\beta^{\alpha_1+\alpha_2}\Gamma(\alpha_1)\Gamma(\alpha_2)}\int_0^{+\infty}u_2^{\alpha_1+\alpha_2-1}e^{-\frac{1}{\beta}(1+u_1)u_2}du_2[/tex]

But the integral is just a gamma function (after we change variables). So this means that [tex]\int_0^{+\infty}u_2^{\alpha_1+\alpha_2-1}e^{-\frac{1}{\beta}(1+u_1)u_2}du_2=\frac{\Gamma(\alpha_1+\alpha_2)\beta^{\alpha_1+\alpha_2}}{(1+u_1)^{\alpha_1+\alpha_2}}[/tex].

Plugging this in we get [tex]f_{U_1}(u_1)=\frac{\Gamma(\alpha_1+\alpha_2)u_1^{\alpha_1-1}}{\Gamma(\alpha_1)\Gamma(\alpha_2)(1+u_1)^{\alpha_1+\alpha_2}}=\frac{u_1^{\alpha_1-1}}{\beta(\alpha_1,\alpha_2)(1+u_1)^{\alpha_1+\alpha_2}}[/tex]

So there we go! U_1=X/Y is distributed as that. Now why is this called a beta distribution of the second kind? If you do some transformations you should see that [tex]\beta(\alpha_1,\alpha_2)=\int_0^1x^{\alpha_1}(1-x)^{\alpha_2-1}dx=\int_0^{+\infty}\frac{x^{\alpha_1-1}}{(1+x)^{\alpha_1+\alpha_2}}dx[/tex]

I hope someone finds this interesting ;0

I'll show you why X/Y is called the beta distribution of the second kind.

Suppose X~[tex]\Gamma(\alpha_1,\beta)[/tex] and Y~[tex]\Gamma(\alpha_2,\beta)[/tex], X and Y independent. What is the distribution of [tex]U_1=\frac{X}{Y}[/tex]?

Now this is a multivariate transformation, (http://www.ma.ic.ac.uk/~ayoung/m2s1/Multivariatetransformations.PDF see here if you don't know how to do these), so we will use [tex]U_2=Y[/tex] as an auxillary equation.

So, [tex]g_1(x,y)=x/y[/tex] and [tex]g_2(x,y)=y[/tex] where x,y are positive reals (because they come from a gamma distribution) now it should be clear to see that [tex]g_1^{-1}(x,y)=xy[/tex] and [tex]g_2^{-1}(x,y)=y[/tex]. Note how g_1 and g_2 have range (0,+infty).

Therefore, [tex]f_{(U_1,U_2)}(u_1,u_2)=f_{(x,y)}(g_1^{-1}(u_1,u_2),g_2^{-1}(u_1,u_2))|J|[/tex]. As an exercise you can show that [tex]|J|=u_2[/tex]

Since X and Y are independent [tex]f_{(X,Y)}=f_X f_Y[/tex]

Now [tex]f_{(U_1,U_2)}(u_1,u_2)=f_x(u_1u_2)f_y(u_2)u_2=\frac{e^{-\frac{1}{\beta}(1+u_1)u_2}u_1^{\alpha_1-1}u_2^{\alpha_1+\alpha_2-1}}{\beta^{\alpha_1+\alpha_2}\Gamma(\alpha_1)\Gamma(\alpha_2)}[/tex]

(I have done some simplifying)

Now, we don't want the pdf of (U_1,U_2) we want the pdf of U_1, so we integrate over the joint to get the marginal distribution of U_1.

[tex]f_{U_1}(u_1)=\frac{u_1^{\alpha_1-1}}{\beta^{\alpha_1+\alpha_2}\Gamma(\alpha_1)\Gamma(\alpha_2)}\int_0^{+\infty}u_2^{\alpha_1+\alpha_2-1}e^{-\frac{1}{\beta}(1+u_1)u_2}du_2[/tex]

But the integral is just a gamma function (after we change variables). So this means that [tex]\int_0^{+\infty}u_2^{\alpha_1+\alpha_2-1}e^{-\frac{1}{\beta}(1+u_1)u_2}du_2=\frac{\Gamma(\alpha_1+\alpha_2)\beta^{\alpha_1+\alpha_2}}{(1+u_1)^{\alpha_1+\alpha_2}}[/tex].

Plugging this in we get [tex]f_{U_1}(u_1)=\frac{\Gamma(\alpha_1+\alpha_2)u_1^{\alpha_1-1}}{\Gamma(\alpha_1)\Gamma(\alpha_2)(1+u_1)^{\alpha_1+\alpha_2}}=\frac{u_1^{\alpha_1-1}}{\beta(\alpha_1,\alpha_2)(1+u_1)^{\alpha_1+\alpha_2}}[/tex]

So there we go! U_1=X/Y is distributed as that. Now why is this called a beta distribution of the second kind? If you do some transformations you should see that [tex]\beta(\alpha_1,\alpha_2)=\int_0^1x^{\alpha_1}(1-x)^{\alpha_2-1}dx=\int_0^{+\infty}\frac{x^{\alpha_1-1}}{(1+x)^{\alpha_1+\alpha_2}}dx[/tex]

I hope someone finds this interesting ;0

Last edited by a moderator:

- #4

- 1

- 0

Hello!

I desperately need a proof of the fact that x/(x+y) has a beta distribution.

I desperately need a proof of the fact that x/(x+y) has a beta distribution.

- #5

- 2,161

- 79

Hello!

I desperately need a proof of the fact that x/(x+y) has a beta distribution.

The mean of the beta distribution is [tex] \mu=\frac{\alpha}{\alpha+\beta}[/tex]. Does this help you?

Edit: Look up the PDF and the MGF of the beta distribution. I assume you know the relationship between the gamma and beta functions. By the way, just saying x/(x+y) doesn't mean much by itself. I'm assuming it's relevant to the ratio of two independent gamma distributions.

Last edited:

Share: