MHB Ratio of areas of squares - Challenging problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a challenging geometry problem involving the ratio of areas between two squares, ABCD and KLIJ, with specific vertex connections. The problem presents two scenarios with ratios of 1:3 and 1:4, prompting participants to explore solutions and geometric interpretations. A proposed solution uses similar triangles to derive the area ratio, resulting in a formula that simplifies the calculation of the inner square's dimensions. Additionally, the conversation touches on the behavior of a related function and its geometric implications, including the significance of increasing/decreasing areas and asymptotes. Overall, the thread emphasizes collaborative problem-solving in geometry.
Lancelot1
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I have encountered a very difficult question in geometry. The question has several parts. I really need your help. I have tried solving the first and second ones, not sure I did it correctly, and certainly don't know how to proceed and what the results means. I would really appreciate your help in solving this tricky one...My solution is at the end, below the question.

Thank you in advance !

1) A square ABCD is given. Each vertex is connected with a point on the opposite edge (clockwise) such that the ratio between the closer part to the vertex and the edge of the square is 1:3. Find the ratio of areas between the squares KLIJ and ABCD.

View attachment 8006

2) Solve the previous problem when the ratio is 1:4 instead of 1:3.

3) Complete the following table:

View attachment 8005

What is your conclusion ?

4) Look at the graph of

\[f(x)=\frac{(x-1)^{2}}{x^{2}+1}\]

View attachment 8007

What is the geometric explanation to the function's behavior ?
What is the meaning of area where the function increases / decreases ? What is the meaning of the asymptote ? Can this function be generalized to the negative region ? What does it mean ?

My solution (assuming the length is 1):

View attachment 8008

View attachment 8009
 

Attachments

  • square problem 2.PNG
    square problem 2.PNG
    2.4 KB · Views: 130
  • square problem.PNG
    square problem.PNG
    11.9 KB · Views: 129
  • square problem 3.PNG
    square problem 3.PNG
    4.7 KB · Views: 128
  • square problem 4.PNG
    square problem 4.PNG
    8.7 KB · Views: 114
  • square problem 5.PNG
    square problem 5.PNG
    9.7 KB · Views: 132
Mathematics news on Phys.org
This is an interesting problem. I found it easier to take the size of the large square $ABCD$ to be $n\times n$, so that the lengths of the segments $AE$, $BH$, ... , are $1$.

I think that the best way to tackle the problem is to use similar triangles. The triangles $ABH$ and $AIE$ are similar (having the same angles). The sides of the larger triangle $ABH$ are $1$, $n$ and (by Pythagoras) $\sqrt{n^2+1}$. The hypotenuse of the smaller triangle $AIE$ is $1$, so the ratio of corresponding sides in the triangles is $1:\sqrt{n^2+1}$. From that, you can find the lengths of the other two sides of the smaller triangle.

Now look at the line $AH = AI + IL + LH$. In that equation, you now know everything except $IL$. So you can use that to find the length of the sides of the inner square $IJKL$, which turns out to be $\dfrac{n(n-1)}{\sqrt{n^2+1}}.$ That gives the ratio of the areas of the squares $ABCD$ and $IJKL$ to be $\dfrac{(n-1)^2}{n^2+1}$.

Your calculation using areas is also a good method, and it is correct right up to the last line $S_{KLIJ} = S_{ABCD} - 3S_{\triangle DEA} + 4S_{\triangle DJF}$, which should be $S_{KLIJ} = S_{ABCD} - 4S_{\triangle DEA} + 4S_{\triangle DJF}$.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top