MHB Rational: $(p^2+1)(q^2+1)(r^2+1)$ is Square

  • Thread starter Thread starter kaliprasad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rational
kaliprasad
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,333
Reaction score
0
Show that for $p,q,r$ if $pq+qr+rp=1$ then $(p^2+1)(q^2+1)(r^2+1)$ is square of rational number
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Are $p,\, q$ and $r$ rational numbers?
 
Euge said:
Are $p,\, q$ and $r$ rational numbers?

Thanks for pinpointing. They are rational.
 
Ok then, here's my solution.

We have

$\displaystyle (p^2+1)(q^2+1)(r^2+1)$

$\displaystyle = (pqr)^2 + [(pq)^2 + (qr)^2 + (rp)^2] + (p^2 + q^2 + r^2) + 1$

$\displaystyle = (pqr)^2 + [(pq+qr+rp)^2-2(pqr)(p+q+r)] + [(p+q+r)^2-2(pq+qr+rp)] + 1$

$\displaystyle = (pqr)^2 + [1 - 2(pqr)(p+q+r)] + [(p+q+r)^2-2] + 1$

$\displaystyle = (pqr)^2 - 2(pqr)(p+q+r) + (p+q+r)^2$

$\displaystyle = (pqr - p - q - r)^2$.

Since $p,\, q$ and $r$ are rational, so is $pqr - p - q - r$. Thus we have shown that $(p^2+1)(q^2+1)(r^2+1)$ is the square of the rational number $pqr-p-q-r$.
 
Another solution:
[sp]Let $x^3 - \lambda x^2 + x - \nu = 0$ be the equation with roots $p,q,r$ (so that $\lambda = p+q+r$ and $\nu = pqr$, the coefficient of $x$ being $qr+rp+pq = 1$).

The equation with roots $p^2,q^2,r^2$ is $x^{3/2} - \lambda x + x^{1 /2} - \nu = 0$, or $x^{1 /2}(x+1) = \lambda x + \nu$, or $x(x+1)^2 = \lambda^2x^2 + 2\lambda\nu x + \nu^2$.

The equation with roots $p^2+1, q^2+1, r^2+1$ is obtained by substituting $x-1$ for $x$ in that last equation, getting $(x-1)x^2 = \lambda^2(x-1)^2 + 2\lambda\nu (x-1) + \nu^2$, or $x^3 - (1+\lambda^2)x^2 + 2\lambda(\lambda-\nu)x - (\lambda^2 - 2\lambda\nu + \nu^2) = 0$. The product of the roots of that equation is $(p^2+1)(q^2+1)(r^2+1) = \lambda^2 - 2\lambda\nu + \nu^2 = (\lambda - \nu)^2$, which is the square of the rational number $\lambda - \nu$.[/sp]
 
2 excellent solutions above. Here is mine and definitely more complex and hence not elegant

$pq+qr+rp = 1$

so $p = \dfrac{1-qr}{q+r}$
Here I may mention that if $q+r = 0$ the we can permute $p,q,r$ such that q+r is not zero

if we chose $q =\ tan\, A$ and $r =\ tan\ B$
we get

$\frac{1}{p} =\dfrac{q+r}{1-qr} =\dfrac {(\tan\ A +\ tan\ B}{(1- \tan\ A\ tan\ B}=\ tan (A+B)$

or $p = \cot (A+B)$

we can chose q and r to be <1 in case we want positive else even -ve also
$(p^2+1) (q^2+1)(r^2+ 1)$
= $\sec^2 A\ \sec ^2 B\ \csc^2 (A+B)$
= $\dfrac{(\sec^2 A\ \ sec^2 B}{\sin^2 (A+B)}$
this is square of reciprocal of $\ sin (A+B)\ cos\ A\ \cos\ B$
$\sin (A+B) \cos\ A\ \cos B$
=$( \sin\ A\ \cos B + \cos\ A\ \sin B)cos\ A\ \ cos\ B$
=$ \sin\ A\ \cos \ A\ \cos ^2B +\ cos^2 A \ \sin B\ \ cos B$
=$\tan\ A\ \ cos ^2 A\ \ cos ^2 B +\ tan\ B \ \
cos ^2 A\ \ cos ^2 B$
= ${(\tan\ A + \tan\ B)}{/(\sec^2 A\ \sec ^2B)}$
= $\dfrac{tan\ A + tan\ B}{(1+ tan ^2 A)(1+ tan ^2B)}$

so $(p^2+1) (q^2+1)(r^2+ 1)$
= $\dfrac{((1+ \tan ^2 A )(1+\tan ^2B)}{(\tan \ A +\ tan B))^2}$

if $ \tan \ A$ and $tan\ B$ that is q and r are rational then

$\dfrac{(1+ \tan ^2 A)(1+\tan ^2B)}{(\tan\ A +\tan\ B)}$ is rational and so $(p^2 +1)(q^2+1)(r^2 +1)$ is the square of a rational no.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top