Rationalizing Complex Denominators for Scientists

  • Thread starter Thread starter cragar
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the process of rationalizing complex denominators, specifically focusing on the expression 1/((i-s)^2). Participants are exploring the terminology and methods associated with this mathematical concept.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning whether multiplying the numerator and denominator by (i+s)^2 is the correct approach to rationalize the denominator. There is also a discussion about the proper terminology for this process, with some suggesting "put into standard form" instead of "rationalize."

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the terminology, asserting that "rationalize" is appropriate in this context. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of rationalizing the denominator and whether it leads to a real number.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the definitions and implications of rationalizing in both mathematical and linguistic terms, as well as the potential outcomes depending on the value of s.

cragar
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



1/((i-s)^2)) how do i rationalize this , would i multpiy top and bottom by
(i+s)^2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cragar said:
1/((i-s)^2)) how do i rationalize this , would i multpiy top and bottom by
(i+s)^2

(rationalize? anyway …)

Yup! :biggrin:
 
k thank-you
 
tiny-tim said:
(rationalize? anyway …)


By the way, what is the proper term? (assuming "rationalize" is not)
 
"Rationalize" is the correct vocabulary for what you wanted.
 


Unit said:
By the way, what is the proper term? (assuming "rationalize" is not)

Hi Unit! Hi symbolipoint! :smile:

Well, "rationalize" means to make rational, which this doesn't, neither in the English nor in the mathematical sense.

It actually puts a complex number into the standard x + iy form, so I'd prefer to say "put into standard form" …

however … now you raise the point, I see that http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/cmplx2.html#c2 and others do say "rationalize" … I wonder why? :redface:
 
But it's asking to rationalize the denominator which is achieved. The denominator becomes real, and possibly rational depending on the value of s.
 
For ex. 1/i where i is complex number. By multiplying with i / i you get i / i2 = i / (-1), which makes the denominator real number (also rational) since I can write (-1) as (-1)/1 and the final equation would be i / (-1) / 1. Now the denominator is rational and I rationalize the equation. :smile:

Regards.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K