Reaction Coefficient: 2IO3-+wH2O2+xH+=>I2+yO2+zH2O - Answers Explained

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on balancing the chemical reaction 2IO3- + wH2O2 + xH+ => I2 + yO2 + zH2O. Participants emphasize the importance of balancing charges and atoms to determine the correct coefficients for y and z. The hints provided suggest using half-reactions and focusing on charge conservation. Ultimately, the discussion reveals that the correct approach involves understanding oxidation states and applying stoichiometric principles effectively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Chemical equation balancing techniques
  • Understanding of half-reactions in redox chemistry
  • Knowledge of oxidation states and charge conservation
  • Familiarity with stoichiometric coefficients
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of balancing redox reactions using half-reactions
  • Learn about oxidation states and their role in chemical equations
  • Explore the principles of charge conservation in chemical reactions
  • Practice balancing complex chemical equations with multiple variables
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, educators, and professionals involved in chemical research or education who seek to enhance their understanding of reaction balancing and redox processes.

ChloeYip
Messages
93
Reaction score
1
Please post this type of questions in the HW section using the template.
Consider the following chemical equation:
  • 2IO3-+wH2O2+xH+=>I2+yO2+zH2O
Which of the following is the correct combination of the reaction coefficient y and z?
  • A) 4&5
  • B) 5&4
  • C) 5&6
  • D) 6&5
How to obtain the answer? Thank you~
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try to balance the reaction equation.
 
I know. I have tried simutaneous equation already, but i failed to do so.
Can you give me more concrete steps?
Thank you.
 
Simultaneous equations have problems with every system where hydrogen peroxide is being oxidized.

Hint: H2O2 → 2H+ + 2e- + O2
 
A very easy example :oldtongue: , should hit in eye that total electric charges left have to equal those right (charges somehow make things more obvious although the principle is not really different from anything without charges).
 
i still don't understand...
how to solve with 4 variables...
i have tried to solve by charges and atoms, but have no ideas to get the answer
thanks
 
I don't know what you have done. Simply, what is the total charge on the right, what is it on the left?
 
I'll modify that. I'll say that the first step, not yet taken, doesn't come easier.

After that I see a difficulty. The answers you have given to choose from all seem wrong to me
 
Ah on third thoughts I see it. This is really tricky and seems to be a test of chemical knowledge, not just stoichiometric balancing. Leads to something advanced and specialized.

But you haven't taken the first step. Do that and get a reasonable answer without worrying whether it fits the question options, then we can talk..
 
  • #10
to deal with the charge,
x should be 2
but the question is asking about y and z, it seems no use to find out x...
how they can be work out?
thanks
 
  • #11
Can you write reduction half reaction for IO3-?
 
  • #12
ChloeYip said:
to deal with the charge,
x should be 2
but the question is asking about y and z, it seems no use to find out x...
how they can be work out?
thanks
That's half the first step, can you complete it and write a reasonable reaction balance that makes sense? Never mind the question options, see what I said about them.
 
  • #13
Come on, both of you, why do ignore the simplest approach - I gave two hints, follow them an you will get the correct answer in almost no time.
 
  • #14
i am not sure how to write the half equation...
is it like this?(just an attempt…):
2IO3-=>I2+(1/2)O2

what is the use for writting half equation?
what is the next step?
thanks~
 
  • #15
ah..
just forget to balance the charge with electron

correction:
2IO3-=>I2+(1/2)O2+6e-
 
  • #16
i really still don't have any idea on how to deal with it...
 
Last edited:
  • #18
ChloeYip said:
ah..
just forget to balance the charge with electron

correction:
2IO3-=>I2+(1/2)O2+6e-

Still needs correction - misled by way you have written maybe: there are not 6 e- in 2IO3-. And where have five O gone?

(Where has Chloe Yip gone?)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K