Reactive metal wires in a fuel oxidizer mixture

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the potential effects of incorporating thin magnesium wires into a slow-burning pyrotechnic mixture, specifically a combination of potassium nitrate (KNO3) and powdered charcoal. It is suggested that the presence of magnesium, known for its rapid combustion in oxidizer mixtures, could significantly accelerate the ignition and combustion rate of the KNO3-charcoal mix. The idea is to create multiple ignition points to enhance the overall combustion speed. While this presents an intriguing combustion science problem, there are concerns regarding safety, as such mixtures can detonate and produce pressure waves even when unconfined. The conversation emphasizes caution and discourages non-experts from experimenting with these materials.
hilbert2
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,600
Reaction score
607
TL;DR Summary
Small mass-% of reactive metal (magnesium or similar) wires being able to accelerate the combustion of a pyrotechnic mixture.
Suppose there's some slow burning pyrotechnic mixture like KNO##_3## with powdered charcoal, and several really thin threads/wires of magnesium metal (or zirconium or magnesium/aluminum alloy) are made go through a pile of that mixture. Now I would guess that because a mixture of finely powdered magnesium with oxidizers burns with a really fast "flash", and is used in fireworks for that purpose, the effect of even a small amount of magnesium wires through that kind of KNO##_3##-C mixture would be to make it combust much faster with the fire propagating more rapidly on the surface of those metal wires. So the idea is to make the slow pyrotechnic mix ignite at several points at the same time to accelerate the combustion rate. I'm not sure if this has any real application unless those reactive metals become much more expensive for some reason, but it's a bit interesting as a combustion science problem.

I haven't been risking playing with that kind of mixes after teenage years anymore, but I have been working in a fire safety / combustion project some years ago. Definitely not recommending this as an experiment for non-scientists, because those "flash" pyrotechnic mixtures can actually detonate with a pressure wave even when unconfined, if a large enough pile of them is ignited.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top