Real Symmetric Endomorphism: Diagonalizability and Eigenvalues Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter penguin007
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Symmetric
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 4K views
penguin007
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
Hi,

We know that if u is a real symetric endomorphism, then u has a real eigenvalue and that u is diagonalizable.
But can we say that u is diagonalizable with only real eigenvalues?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. Since you are talking about eigenvalues, I take it that u is an endomorphism on some vector space (a linear transformation from vector space V to itself). Specifically, if u is symmetric and [itex]\lambda[/itex] is an eigenvalue, then there exist non-zero x such that ux= \lambda x. Further, we can take x to have magnitude 1: <x, x>= 1. Then [itex]\lambda= \lambda<x, x>= <\lambda x, x>= <ux, x>= <x, ux>[/itex] (because u is symmetric). [itex]<x , ux>= \overline{<ux, x>}= \overline{\lambda x, x}= \overline{\lambda}\overline{<x, x>}= \overline{\lambda}[/itex].
(The overline indicates complex conjugation.)

Since [itex]\lambda= \overline{\lambda}[/itex], [itex]\lambda[/itex] is real. That is all eigenvalues are real for a symmetric endomorphism.
 
I think you forgot an overline in the end, but I can't understand why we have:
<x,ux>=conjugate(<ux,x>) ?
 
penguin007 said:
I think you forgot an overline in the end, but I can't understand why we have:
<x,ux>=conjugate(<ux,x>) ?
One of the requirements in the definition of "inner product" is that [itex]<u, v>= \overline{<v, u>}[/itex]. Of course, if the vector space is over the real numbers, that is the same as "<u, v>= <v, u>" but then your question is trivial.