Reason justifying it's own reasonings.

  • Thread starter Willowz
  • Start date
  • #1
198
1
I think this process happens very often. Somebody starts with some assumptions or premises and his or her reason is justifying these premises. I mean words are circular after all and if you open any book on theology and/or God you might get my point.

Here's the question. How do we avoid unnecessary rationalisation? It's so useless and such a waste of time.

Is science the answer to this epistemic problem? Can you actually think "scientifically"?
 
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
2,126
0
"Unnecessary" implies it is useless or at least extraneous and a pragmatic approach is preferred.
 
  • #3
44
0
What do you mean? I don't know much philosophy/logic. Are you asking how do we justify logic? I don't think we can. If we try to justify logic by using logic, that'd just be circular. If we try to invent some higher form of logic, we still have the same issue or trying to justify that. Invent an even higher form of logic or use that higher form to justify itself? I think we just take it for granted or just have blind faith in it, logic I mean.

I think most premises come from induction stuff and some from deduction.
 
  • #4
Evo
Mentor
23,540
3,177
This thread does not meet philosophy guidelines.
 

Related Threads on Reason justifying it's own reasonings.

  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Poll
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
6K
D
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
924
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
2K
Top