Redox for covalently bonded species?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pivoxa15
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Redox
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relevance and application of the redox convention in reactions involving covalently bonded species. Participants explore the implications of oxidation states in such reactions, questioning whether the redox framework is appropriate or necessary when no changes in oxidation numbers occur.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that using the redox convention for covalently bonded species is unnatural, as reactions can occur without changes in oxidation numbers.
  • Others suggest that redox numbers provide a useful method for tracking electron movement in reactions, regardless of the bonding type.
  • A participant questions the assumption that no change in oxidation state occurs during reactions between covalent species, asserting that many changes in oxidation state are observed in covalent compounds.
  • There is a distinction made between the behavior of covalent and metallic species regarding oxidation states, with some participants emphasizing that metals exhibit clearer changes in oxidation numbers.
  • One participant notes that while organic compounds can undergo oxidation and reduction, the definitions of these processes may differ from traditional redox reactions involving metals.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity and applicability of the redox convention for covalently bonded species. No consensus is reached regarding its relevance or the interpretation of oxidation states in these contexts.

Contextual Notes

Some claims about the relationship between oxidation states and covalent reactions remain unresolved, and the discussion highlights the complexity of defining redox processes in organic chemistry compared to traditional metal-based reactions.

pivoxa15
Messages
2,250
Reaction score
1
What is the point of using the redox convention in describing reactions involving covalently bonded species? To me it is a very unnatural thing to do? A reaction can occur with a rearrangement of atoms but no change in oxidation numbers of the atoms so a redox reaction hasn't occurred but a reaction in general has.

I think using the redox convention involving metals is very natural as electons are easily seen to be transferred.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Redox #'s are used simply as a method to have a handle on where electrons are moving. It is just something people invented to make their understanding of certain reactions easier.
 
pivoxa15 said:
What is the point of using the redox convention in describing reactions involving covalently bonded species? To me it is a very unnatural thing to do? A reaction can occur with a rearrangement of atoms but no change in oxidation numbers of the atoms so a redox reaction hasn't occurred but a reaction in general has.
What gives you the impression that there is no change in oxidation state when covalent species react? In fact, I'd venture that most changes in oxidation state are seen in fairly covalent compounds.
 
Gokul43201 said:
What gives you the impression that there is no change in oxidation state when covalent species react? In fact, I'd venture that most changes in oxidation state are seen in fairly covalent compounds.

I said some reactions between covalent species doesn't involve a change in oxidation states, not all.

I don't see the importance of keeping oxidation numbers for colvalent bonded species. When two covalently bonded species react, what is the point of knowing which is the reductance and oxidant? These species will always 'think' they have valence shell filled. However with metals, a change in oxidation number reflects a change in the number of its valence shell electrons.
 
pivoxa15 said:
What is the point of using the redox convention in describing reactions involving covalently bonded species? To me it is a very unnatural thing to do? A reaction can occur with a rearrangement of atoms but no change in oxidation numbers of the atoms so a redox reaction hasn't occurred but a reaction in general has.

I think using the redox convention involving metals is very natural as electons are easily seen to be transferred.

The "oxidation" and "reduction" may not be identical in definition with respect to organic compounds and actual redox reactions. Organic compounds can be oxidized or reduced; the carbon that is oxidized for instance, the secondary alcohol carbon to the carbonyl carbon of a ketone, is going to have an altered oxidation state as a result. You may or may not have been taught how to derive the numerical value for this concept on a particular atom in an organic compound but it isn't essentially equivalent to the formal charge.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
9K