Redshift effect And photon energy loss

Click For Summary
Photons experience a redshift as they travel due to the relative motion of observers or gravitational effects, but they do not lose energy during this process. The confusion often arises from the distinction between redshift caused by the Doppler effect and gravitational redshift. Einstein's theories clarify that while light can appear to shift to longer wavelengths, its frequency remains unchanged in a vacuum, meaning no energy is lost. The energy perceived by different observers varies based on their relative motion or gravitational fields, rather than an actual loss of energy by the photons themselves. Understanding these concepts resolves the confusion surrounding the redshift effect.
ujellytek
Messages
35
Reaction score
2
I've been searching around the web to figure out why photons shift towards the longer wavelengths as they travel from stars and other light sources but I haven't figured out why they loose energy as they travel ( and after reading some web pages I was told that they don't even loose the energy as they travel) so essentially I'm all confused on this topic. Here are my questions. How do photons loose the energy in the red shift effect? Where does that energy lost go?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ujellytek said:
I've been searching around the web to figure out why photons shift towards the longer wavelengths as they travel from stars and other light sources but I haven't figured out why they loose energy as they travel ( and after reading some web pages I was told that they don't even loose the energy as they travel) so essentially I'm all confused on this topic. Here are my questions. How do photons loose the energy in the red shift effect? Where does that energy lost go?
It's not clear if you talk about redshift due to speed or due to gravitation; you already got an answer about the effect of speed, and the discussion in the link is a good primer for the effect of gravitation.

Concerning gravitation there is some disagreement, in part perhaps due to Einstein who in 1911 suggested that radiation can loose energy in transfer, but in that same paper clarified that radiation cannot change frequency on its travel through vacuum - and without a change in frequency there is also no "lost energy". That second consideration fits neatly with the reference about speed that Bill gave and leads to consistent descriptions.
For example Einstein predicted the gravitational redshift effect of light from stars because it is emitted at lower frequencies:

"Thus the clock goes more slowly if set up in the neighbourhood of ponderable masses. From this it follows that the spectral lines of light reaching us from the surface of large stars must appear displaced towards the red end of the spectrum."
- p.198, Foundation of General Relativity, 1916. http://web.archive.org/web/20060829045130/http://www.Alberteinstein.info/gallery/gtext3.html
 
Last edited:
Alright thanks guys. You guys have given me enough info , thanks.
 
Moderator's note: Spin-off from another thread due to topic change. In the second link referenced, there is a claim about a physical interpretation of frame field. Consider a family of observers whose worldlines fill a region of spacetime. Each of them carries a clock and a set of mutually orthogonal rulers. Each observer points in the (timelike) direction defined by its worldline's tangent at any given event along it. What about the rulers each of them carries ? My interpretation: each...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
997
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K