References: continuum approximation of discrete sums?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the accuracy of the continuum approximation of discrete sums, particularly in the context of quantum optics. Key references include the article "Sum to Int" and the paper by J. M. Zhang and Y. Liu discussing Fermi's golden rule. The Euler-Maclaurin formula is highlighted as a mathematical tool relevant to this approximation. Participants express a need for less abstract analyses and practical applications comparing exact sums to continuum approximations, especially regarding their impact on experimental results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of continuum approximations in mathematical physics
  • Familiarity with the Euler-Maclaurin formula
  • Knowledge of Fermi's golden rule and its derivation
  • Basic concepts of quantum optics and oscillator modes
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Euler-Maclaurin formula and its applications in physics
  • Study the derivation of Fermi's golden rule in detail
  • Explore the implications of continuum approximations in quantum optics
  • Investigate the role of zeta functions and Bernoulli functions in mathematical analysis
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, physicists, and students in mathematical physics, particularly those interested in quantum optics and the mathematical foundations of continuum approximations.

yucheng
Messages
232
Reaction score
57
Is there more references for how accurate is the continuum approximation to discrete sums? Perhaps more mathematical.

What I've found:
https://lonitch.github.io/Sum-to-Int/
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2102.10941.pdf

Some examples are:
Sum to integral
$$\sum_{\mathbf{k}} \to 2 \left ( \frac{L}{2 \pi} \right ) \int d^3k$$

Density of oscillator modes etc
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here is Terry Tao discussing the Euler-Maclaurin formula mentioned in your arxiv link: link.

EDIT: Also, is there a reason you posted this in the Quantum subforum?
 
Haborix said:
EDIT: Also, is there a reason you posted this in the Quantum subforum?
Thanks!

Yes it appears in many places in Quantum optics, so I was hoping that there is a less mathematically abstract analysis, especially that of the error in the approximation (for instance, applying it to a model physical system, comparing the exact sum vs continuum approximation), whether it causes deviations from experimental results.....

P.S. the zeta functions, bernoulli functions makes me want to cry, but if that's what's needed, then I'll have to slowly crawl my way there...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
I did find one! Serendipity!

Fermi's golden rule: its derivation and breakdown by an ideal model by J. M. Zhang, Y. Liu

Search in document:
in replacing the summation by an integral, the sampling step-length
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1604.06916.pdf
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K