Relativistic addition of orthogonal velocities

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two particles being emitted simultaneously from a point in an inertial frame, moving with equal speeds in orthogonal directions. The objective is to determine the speed of each particle relative to the other, utilizing concepts from relativistic velocity transformation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply Lorentz transformations to find the relative velocity of the two particles, but encounters an extra factor in their result. Other participants question the use of the dot product in the velocity transformation and discuss the implications of orthogonal velocities.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, exploring different interpretations of the velocity transformation. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of Lorentz transformations and the relationship between coordinates in different frames. The original poster has made progress towards a solution based on suggestions from others.

Contextual Notes

There is some confusion regarding the application of the dot product in the context of orthogonal velocities and how it relates to the velocity transformation equations. The discussion reflects a need for clarification on these concepts.

Pi-Bond
Messages
300
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In a given inertial frame, two particles are shout out simultaneously from a given point, with equal speeds v, in orthogonal directions. What is the speed of each particle relative to the other?

Answer: [itex]v{(2-\frac{v^{2}}{c^{2}})}^{1/2}[/itex]

Homework Equations


Velocity Transformation
[itex]v_{total}=\sqrt{v_{x}^{2}+v_{y}^{2}}[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution


Let the given inertial frame be denoted by S, and let the particles be emitted in the +x and +y directions. Let S' be the rest frame of the particle emitted in the +x direction. These two frames will coincide at t=0 (time of emission), hence the Lorentz transforms are applicable.

In S', the x component of the velocity of the particle going in the +y direction would -v, as that particle has no x component of velocity. The y component would be given by the velocity transformation:

[itex]v'_{y}=\large \frac{(v) \sqrt{1-\frac{v^{2}} {c^{2}}} } {1- \frac{(v)(v)}{c^{2}}} = \frac{v}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^{2}} {c^{2}}}}[/itex]

The relative velocity would then be-

[itex]v_{rel} = \sqrt{v'_{x}^{2}+v'_{y}^{2}} =\large \sqrt{v^{2}+\frac{v^{2}} {1- \frac{ v^{2} }{ c^{2} } } }[/itex]

Which would yield

[itex]v_{rel}= v{(2-\frac{v^{2}}{c^{2}})}^{1/2} \large \frac{1}{\sqrt{1- \frac{ v^{2} }{ c^{2} }}}[/itex]

So I have an extra factor in my answer. What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the (v)(v)/c^2 in your formula for v'_y should be the dot product of the two original velocities. That's zero since they are orthogonal vectors.
 
Is that so? How is the expression with the dot product derived then? I just assumed that the velocity in frame S' is given by [itex]\frac{y'}{t'}[/itex]. And from the Lorentz transforms:

[itex]y'=y[/itex]
[itex]t'=\gamma (t - \frac {vx}{c^{2}})[/itex]

where v is the velocity of frame S' with respect to S. Where does the dot product come in?
 
The dot product arises because only the component of velocity in the direction of the boost is contracted. I'm sure you could find a general derivation somewhere.

What I would do, though, is transform the coordinates of the second particle using the Lorentz transformations and express x' and y' as a function of t' (not t). From that expression, you can see what the components of the velocity are to an observer at rest in the moving frame.
 
Ok, I got the answer following vela's suggestion. In the frame S, the coordinates of the particle going up in the +y direction are given by:

[itex]x=0[/itex]
[itex]y=vt[/itex]

Transforming these to the frame S' gives the coordinates:

[itex]x'= - \gamma vt[/itex]
[itex]y'=vt[/itex]

The inverse Lorentz transform from S' to S gives:

[itex]t= \gamma (t'+\frac{vx}{c^{2}})[/itex]

Which on substituting x yields:

[itex]t=t' \sqrt{1-\frac{v^{2}} {c^{2}} }[/itex]

Substituting this in the original equations for x' and y', and differentiating with respect to t' yields the velocity components of the particle moving in the +y direction in S':

[itex]v'_{x}=-v[/itex] (as expected)
[itex]v'_{y}=v\sqrt{1-\frac{v^{2}} {c^{2}} }[/itex]

And these give the required result. I assume you suggested to put x' and y' in terms of t' so that the reading would be at the same time in S', right?

Also, I don't see why the dot product is required in the y-velocity transformation. I assumed that the "v" there was the velocity in the y direction, not any arbitrary direction...none of my books shed light on this.
 
Pi-Bond said:
I assume you suggested to put x' and y' in terms of t' so that the reading would be at the same time in S', right?
Not really. I suggested it because [itex]v'_x = dx'/dt'[/itex], not [itex]dx'/dt[/itex].
 
Ok - Thanks for the help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K