Relativistic maxwell-boltzmann-distribution

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter magicfountain
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relativistic
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of the relativistic Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution in thermodynamics, particularly for gases at high temperatures where average speeds approach the speed of light (c). It emphasizes the necessity of replacing the nonrelativistic formula with a relativistic expression to accurately describe particle behavior. The conversation highlights the use of the partition function with the relativistic energy expression, specifically e^{-\beta\sqrt{m^2+p^2}}, and the integration involving the K2(T) Bessel function to normalize the distribution for N particles per volume.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermodynamics principles
  • Familiarity with the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution
  • Knowledge of relativistic physics concepts
  • Experience with partition functions in statistical mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the relativistic Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution
  • Learn about the K2(T) Bessel function and its applications
  • Explore Lagrange multipliers in statistical mechanics
  • Investigate the implications of relativistic effects on gas behavior at high temperatures
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, thermodynamics researchers, and students studying statistical mechanics who are interested in the behavior of gases under relativistic conditions.

magicfountain
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
In thermodynamics (ignoring relativistic effects) you can use the maxwell-boltzmann-distribution to find the average speed of the gas particles.
v^2=\frac{8kT}{\pi m}

But there are high Temperatures that would have average speeds > c.
Are there distributions that describe gases with an average speed of 0.5 relativistically?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, you have to replace the nonrelativistic formula with the relativistic one.

The average squared velocity will go towards c^2, and all particles are always slower than c for every temperature.
 
mfb said:
Well, you have to replace the nonrelativistic formula with the relativistic one.

...which to me is not very illuminating, since it's given without any derivation and written in terms of a goofy choice of variable.

Can't you just take the partition function and put in the relativistic expression for the energy? I.e.:

e^{-\beta\sqrt{m^2+p^2}}

This is in units with c=1, and beta is the inverse temperature.
 
Yes, I think so. And I see the Maxwell–Juttner expression does consist of this Boltzmann factor, plus a function of T in front. To get the factor in front you have to normalize the distribution to N particles per volume, which involves integrating over the Boltzmann factor. Nonrelativistically the integral leads to (m/2πkT)3/2. But here we have to integrate over the relativistic Boltzmann factor, and that's where the K2(T) Bessel function comes from.
 
@bcrowell
@Bill_K
that helped a lot. i guessed that i had to do lagrange multipliers with relativistic expressions, but i was too lazy to really think about it. thanks for reminding me that it actually just leads to the partition function and you have to plug in the rel. terms there.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K