Remeasurement of a quantum system

swain1
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
After making a measurement of a particular dynamical variable the wavefunction collapses into the corresponding eigenfunction. As I understand when the variable is then measured again the results and relative probabilities of eigenvalues are exactly the same as before. I don't understand why they are the same as before. What happens to the wavefunction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it slowly starts spreading out again.
 
ok. Why does it spread out though? Is there a reasoning behind why the eigenvalues will be the same when another measurement is made. There was a question in a book that kind of asked for an answer to this but I can't work out why?
 
Information. Start out with a state described by an eigenfunction then apply the propogator to it which describes the time evolution. At a later time the probability of observing some state is proportional to the overlap integral between the initial and final state...to put it simply
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top