Republicans pushing to eliminate the IRS

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter wasteofo2
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the proposal by some Republicans to eliminate the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and replace the current tax system with alternatives such as a national sales tax or a value-added tax (VAT). Participants explore the implications of such a change on the economy, taxation fairness, and government functionality.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express skepticism about the feasibility of eliminating the IRS, questioning whether such a radical proposal would be supported by Bush.
  • Concerns are raised regarding the potential regressiveness of a national sales tax or VAT, particularly in relation to the current progressive tax system.
  • One participant suggests that exemptions for essential expenses like rent and food could mitigate the regressive nature of a sales tax.
  • Several posts discuss the constitutional basis for income taxes, with some asserting that the income tax is indeed constitutional due to the 16th amendment, while others argue that the government functioned without it for a long time.
  • Participants debate the implications of eliminating the IRS, including potential spending cuts and economic revitalization, but question whether a flat tax could significantly reduce the deficit.
  • There are personal anecdotes regarding government worker salaries and perceived inefficiencies, with some expressing frustration over the disparity between public and private sector wages.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the proposal to eliminate the IRS. There are multiple competing views regarding the implications of such a change, particularly concerning tax fairness and economic impact.

Contextual Notes

Discussions include varying interpretations of constitutional provisions related to taxation and differing opinions on the economic consequences of tax reform proposals. Some arguments are based on speculative interpretations of historical tax practices.

  • #31
I'm convinced that Hastert wants this, but not so convinced that W does. He had absolutely no problem imposing a flat tax on Iraq, and look at the disaster that resulted. If a national flat tax/sales tax is passed the federal government might be finished-- it will certainly cease to exist as a representative of common people. A flat tax and/or sales tax w/o income tax will weaken the system by taking money out at the bottom, creating instability for the top. The final result would be a broke, fuedalist state with a totalitarian regieme.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
schwarzchildradius said:
A flat tax and/or sales tax w/o income tax will weaken the system by taking money out at the bottom, creating instability for the top. The final result would be a broke, fuedalist state with a totalitarian regieme.

Well that's a slippery-slope argument if I've ever heard one. You don't think there might be some necessary intermediate events between a flat tax and feudal totalitarianism?
 
  • #33
loseyourname said:
Well that's a slippery-slope argument if I've ever heard one. You don't think there might be some necessary intermediate events between a flat tax and feudal totalitarianism?

No, it would take several days, the Internet would collapse in the process delaying the natural progression.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 124 ·
5
Replies
124
Views
17K
Replies
53
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 204 ·
7
Replies
204
Views
29K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
10K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K