MHB Require assistance with possible ANOVA use

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dants
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    anova Assistance
Dants
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I have recorded the dominant hand strength from all of my participants. I have also recorded a number of anthropometric properties of my participants, including a measure of skin-fold adjusted forearm girth, with the intention of estimating the amount of musculature in the forearm. I have recorded this data from 18 males and 18 females.

I would like to illustrate the interpretation of any sex-related differences in grip strength that might i fI consider the amount of musculature in the forearm.

Am I correct to assume that I should be using a simple ANOVA for this analysis?

Thanks,

Dants
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Could be wrong, but I don't think your sample size is large enough to get a statistically significant result, assuming there was one.
 
I have yet to start the analytics. I was more so inquiring about which analysis was appropriate to use in order to find the results.
 
If the assumptions of ANOVA are satisfied, you should be good to go.
 

Thread 'Roulette wheel physics and probability'

Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
View full post »
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'

Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'

The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
View full post »

Similar threads

MHB Require assistance with possible multiple regression analysis
Replies
1
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top