Resistors: Questions & Answers Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter pandaboi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resistors
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 3K views
pandaboi
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



c8RVcDy.png
I'm not sure how to do these. Other resistor questions are relatively easy but these had me stumped.
An explanation for them would be helpful since all I got are the answers.

The first one is 9.6ohms, second is 0.55ohms.

Not sure if this is advanced but I'm seeking an explanation for these guys. Much thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you familiar with Wye-Delta transformations?
 
Hello pandaboi,

Welcome to Physics Forums! :smile:

pandaboi said:

Homework Statement



c8RVcDy.png



I'm not sure how to do these. Other resistor questions are relatively easy but these had me stumped.
An explanation for them would be helpful since all I got are the answers.

The first one is 9.6ohms, second is 0.55ohms.

Not sure if this is advanced but I'm seeking an explanation for these guys. Much thanks!

For part b), it might help to draw a "virtual" voltage source connected between X and Y (by that I mean connect the positive terminal to X and the negative terminal to Y). Ultimately, you want to find the current though that voltage source, so that you can divide its voltage by the current through it, and then you've found the overall resistance.

Once you've included the voltage source, stop and think about what the voltage drop must be for each of the resistors in the circuit. Sure, you could use Kirchhoff's circuit laws and solve a set of simultaneous equations (which will work -- it's a perfectly valid way to solve this), but there may be a simpler way than that for this particular problem. If you find each resistor's voltage drop, you can find the currents through each resistor, and then ultimately the current though the voltage source. You'll still need to heed Kirchhoff's laws, but you might be able to skip the tedium of solving simultaneous equations (for this particular problem).

Btw, part a) is easier because it has that symmetry that NascentOxygen mentioned. But if it didn't have that symmetry, this process I describe of adding a virtual voltage source and solving the simultaneous equations is a sure-fire way to solve these (even problems that don't have shortcuts like these). :wink: