Resolving the Age Discrepancies of Meteorite Dating: A Scientific Analysis

  • Thread starter Thread starter scatterbrain8
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Meteorite
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on reconciling three different age measurements of a meteorite: a rubidium-strontium age of 4.5 billion years, a gas retention age of 1.5 billion years, and a cosmic ray exposure age of 10 million years. The consensus is that the rubidium-strontium dating provides the most accurate formation age of the meteorite, indicating it formed 4.5 billion years ago. The gas retention age reflects the last significant thermal event, while the cosmic ray exposure age is influenced by surface exposure and does not represent the meteorite's formation time. Differentiation within the meteorite may also affect age readings.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rubidium-strontium dating techniques
  • Knowledge of gas retention age concepts
  • Familiarity with cosmic ray exposure dating
  • Basic principles of meteorite differentiation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research rubidium-strontium dating methods and their applications
  • Explore gas retention age and its implications for geological dating
  • Learn about cosmic ray exposure dating techniques
  • Investigate the effects of meteorite differentiation on age measurements
USEFUL FOR

Geologists, planetary scientists, and researchers involved in meteorite studies and dating techniques will benefit from this discussion.

scatterbrain8
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
You find a meteorite and measure a rubidium-strontium age of 4.5 billion years. However, the gas retention age of the meteorite is 1.5 billion years, and the cosmic ray exposure age of the meteorite is 10 million years. When did the meteor form? How can you reconcile the three different age measurements?



Attempt at solution: So I'm not entirely sure about this because I don't really know anything about rubidium-strontium dating, but I think that the meteor formed 4.5 billion years ago. The gas retention age would only allow us to date back to the last time the meteor had been struck hard or had been heated up enough to allow gas to escape, so this wouldn't give us an accurate measure of the age of the meteor. The cosmic ray exposure would also doesn't give us an accurate measure of the age because cosmic rays only penetrate up to about a meter. In addition, differentiation in the meteorite would probably throw this age off as the elements on the meteor that were initially exposed to the sun may have moved to somewhere else inside the meteorite by now.

Is my guess right? Or would the rubidium strontium age only tell us the age of the rock particles that formed the meteorite?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
thanks, i think I've got it now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K