Rest Frame of a Photon - FAQ by Forum Members

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter D H
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frame Photon Rest
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 replies · 20K views
I've read that in relativity the concept of the rest frame of a photon doesn't make sense. Why is that?

A rest frame of some object is a reference frame in which the object's velocity is zero. One of the key axioms of special relativity is that light moves at c in all reference frames. The rest frame of a photon would require the photon to be at rest (velocity=0) and moving at c (velocity=299792458 m/s). That of course is contradictory. In other words, the concept doesn't make sense.The following forum members have contributed to this FAQ:
D H
Dale
Fredrik
Pallen
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2 and Kyle.Nemeth
on Phys.org
One thing to add to this is a brief comment that while it is not possible to have a reference frame (tetrad) where light is at rest, it is possible to have a non-inertial coordinate system where some light rays have constant coordinates. Light cone coordinates are one such example. This is one place where it is important to understand the subtle distinction between reference frames (tetrads) and coordinate systems.
 
Last edited: