Retake physics 1 or take modern physics?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around whether a student should retake calculus-based physics 1 or take modern physics as they prepare for a second degree in electrical engineering. The conversation touches on academic prerequisites, the relevance of prior coursework, and potential pathways in engineering education.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how another could take calculus-based physics 2 without first completing calculus-based physics 1, suggesting that while it may have been beneficial, it is not strictly necessary.
  • Some participants propose that if the student performed well in calculus-based physics 2, they could likely succeed in modern physics without retaking physics 1.
  • Concerns are raised about prerequisites for modern physics and future engineering courses, with suggestions to consult an academic advisor for clarity on specific requirements.
  • Another participant mentions that modern physics typically requires a solid foundation in calculus and other advanced math courses, which the student is expected to have completed.
  • There is a suggestion to consider biomedical engineering as a potential path, though some express that it may be too broad compared to focusing on a core engineering discipline.
  • One participant shares their own engineering curriculum, indicating that modern physics was not a requirement for their program, which may vary by institution.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of retaking calculus-based physics 1, with some advocating for taking modern physics instead. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific prerequisites for the student's future engineering program.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of understanding individual program requirements and suggest that prerequisites may vary between institutions. There is uncertainty about the necessity of calculus-based physics 1 for modern physics and engineering courses.

Who May Find This Useful

Students considering a transition to engineering programs, particularly those with a background in physics or related fields, may find this discussion relevant.

Liboy597
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, looking for some input.

I've taken algebra based physics 1 (got an A-) and calc based physics 2. It's my last year of undergrad but I am planning to enter a second degree electrical engineering program in the future. Should I retake calc based physics 1 or take modern physics? Would an engineering program require me to take calc physics 1 before doing the core EE classes?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know how you were able to take calc-based physics 2 without taking the first one but I wouldn't worry about taking calc-based physics 1 just cause you might have "missed out" on something crucial. It MIGHT have prepared you somewhat better. But if you got through physics 2 calc based then I'd take modern physics.

You didn't miss anything you can't learn by yourself since physics 1 has a minimum of actual calculus. Now if pre-requisites are your concern then you should probably talk to your advisor. Your pre-reqs for modern physics 1 or EE courses (depending on the school) might only be Calc-based physics 2. Or it might specifically say both 2211 and 2212 (calc based physics 1 & 2).

In summary if you don't need it as a pre-req for modern physics and future EE courses don't worry about it. Make sure that you have the math pre-reqs though. I know for modern physics its common to already have the calcs 1,2 & 3 and differential equations. Followed by linear algebra and vector calculus.
 
Im a little confused could you explain your academic history in more detail please?7
 
TehBigBoss said:
I don't know how you were able to take calc-based physics 2 without taking the first one but I wouldn't worry about taking calc-based physics 1 just cause you might have "missed out" on something crucial. It MIGHT have prepared you somewhat better. But if you got through physics 2 calc based then I'd take modern physics.

You didn't miss anything you can't learn by yourself since physics 1 has a minimum of actual calculus. Now if pre-requisites are your concern then you should probably talk to your advisor. Your pre-reqs for modern physics 1 or EE courses (depending on the school) might only be Calc-based physics 2. Or it might specifically say both 2211 and 2212 (calc based physics 1 & 2).

In summary if you don't need it as a pre-req for modern physics and future EE courses don't worry about it. Make sure that you have the math pre-reqs though. I know for modern physics its common to already have the calcs 1,2 & 3 and differential equations. Followed by linear algebra and vector calculus.

Thank you very much. Yeah I'm mostly worried about the new school saying I don't have the calc phys 1 pre-req. By the end of this school year I'd have taken calc 1-3, diff eq, lin alg and 2 semesters of mathematical methods in physics. I'll just sign up for modern physics b/c your explanation makes sense and it was what I was thinking.
 
Aero51 said:
Im a little confused could you explain your academic history in more detail please?7

Sure, I'm a bio major about to start senior year. I was just undecided whether I should retake calc physics 1 or modern physics should I decide to enter an engineering program in the future. I'll have taken all of the other "core" math/science courses by the time I finish.
 
Right on. If there's no pre-req conflicts go for modern physics. With that math under your belt you'll do okay. Remember though that engineering programs have a lot of intro engineering classes that are required to move along. Best thing to do is talk to an engineering advisor and explain to them your situation. But before you go into the office read up on the program's curriculum and requirements to graduate so the advisor serves as a confirmation to your research on the school's EE program.
 
In that case, have you considered a Biomedical Engineering route? Depending on what path you take you may get a very good educational combination of EE ME and Bio.

I don't know about all programs, but for my engineering curriculum I did not need modern physics. These were my basic courses before my major (AE) started to become distinct:
Calc I II II
Phy I II (calc based)
Chem I II
Statics
Dynamics
Materials Science
Mechanics of Materials (aka strength of materials)

And most importantly, call the EE department head if this is what you want to pursue
 
Last edited:
Aero51 said:
In that case, have you considered a Biomedical Engineering route? Depending on what path you take you may get a very good educational combination of EE ME and Bio.

The general consensus from those I've spoken to is that biomed is too broad and that its better, at the undergrad level at least, to focus on a core engineering branch and then apply those skills to the biomed side if interested.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K