Retarded Potentials - variable change to actual position.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the Lienard-Wiechert potential for a charged particle moving along the z-axis in cylindrical coordinates. The key equation presented is the L-W potential at retarded time: V = (1 / (4 π ε₀)) * (q / (R_r(1 - β·ĥR_r))). A critical point of the analysis involves the equality of perpendicular components, expressed as |R_r × β|² = |R_p × β|², which is justified by the relationship R_r = R_p + β. This relationship is essential for understanding the retarded potentials in electromagnetic theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lienard-Wiechert potentials
  • Familiarity with cylindrical coordinates in physics
  • Knowledge of electromagnetic theory, specifically retarded time concepts
  • Basic vector calculus, including cross products
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Lienard-Wiechert potentials in detail
  • Explore the implications of retarded time in electromagnetic fields
  • Learn about the application of cylindrical coordinates in electromagnetism
  • Investigate vector calculus techniques, particularly cross products and their properties
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those specializing in electromagnetism, as well as anyone involved in advanced studies of charged particle dynamics and field analysis.

JesseC
Messages
247
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



A charged particle is moving at velocity [tex]\vec{v}=c\vec{\beta}[/tex] along the z-axis. We're working in cylindrical co-ordinates. Here's a picture:

[PLAIN]http://img696.imageshack.us/img696/9789/retardedpotential.png

The problem is to get the Lienard-wiechert potential, which is normally analysed at the retarded time, in terms of the vector [tex]\vec{R_p}[/tex] which points from the actual position of the particle. The point P is where we're analysing the field.

Homework Equations



L-W potential at retarded time:
[tex]V=\frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0}\frac{q}{R_r(1-\vec{\beta}\cdot\hat{R_r})}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm following through a solution to this problem, and out of the blue comes this statement. "Perpendicular components are equal such that:"

[tex]|\vec{R_r} \times \vec{\beta}|^2=|\vec{R_p} \times \vec{\beta}|^2[/tex]

Now it isn't immediately obvious to me why this is true, can anyone shed some light on this?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's true because, from the diagram,

[tex]\vec{R}_r = \vec{R}_p + \vec{\beta}.[/tex]
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K