Retrograde planets enumeration

In summary, there are only eight planets in the universe, and two of them exhibit retrograde motion. The current definition of what constitutes a planet is solar system specific, and includes objects that orbit other stars. There are moves afoot to remove that aspect of heliocentricism from the definition of "planet". Orbiting a star rather than the Sun is the obvious first step to making the concept of a planet more inclusive.
  • #1
petrushkagoogol
28
4
Is it mandatory for any planetary system like our Solar system to have a retrograde orbit planet in it's midst ? Is there any upper limit for the same ?:))
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
petrushkagoogol said:
Is it mandatory for any planetary system like our Solar system to have a retrograde orbit planet in it's midst ?

Our solar system has no planets in retrograde orbit, so it can't be mandatory.
 
  • Like
Likes DrSteve
  • #3
But it is mandatory to have exactly two planets with retrograde rotations.
 
  • Like
Likes petrushkagoogol
  • #4
Alltimegreat1 said:
But it is mandatory to have exactly two planets with retrograde rotations.

That is the way our solar system developed, but I don't think the OP meant a stellar system exactly like our own.
 
  • Like
Likes petrushkagoogol
  • #5
Drakkith said:
Our solar system has no planets in retrograde orbit, so it can't be mandatory.
Planets. All eight planets in the Solar System orbit the Sun in the direction that the Sun is rotating, which is counterclockwise when viewed from above the Sun's north pole. Six of the planets also rotate about their axis in this same direction. The exceptions—the planets with retrograde rotation—are Venus and Uranus.
 
  • #6
Alltimegreat1 said:
But it is mandatory to have exactly two planets with retrograde rotations.
Can you please explain why ?
 
  • #7
petrushkagoogol said:
Planets. All eight planets in the Solar System orbit the Sun in the direction that the Sun is rotating, which is counterclockwise when viewed from above the Sun's north pole. Six of the planets also rotate about their axis in this same direction. The exceptions—the planets with retrograde rotation—are Venus and Uranus.

Were you talking about retrograde orbits, or retrograde rotations?
 
  • #8
petrushkagoogol said:
Can you please explain why ?
Alltimegreat1 was playing a game, and not a nice game. Per the current definition of what is or is not a planet, there are only eight planets in the entire universe, and two of them exhibit retrograde motion.

The current definition of what constitutes a planet is solar system specific ("a planet is an object that orbit the Sun ..."). All of those objects orbiting other stars discovered by the Kepler mission and other techniques? They're not planets. They are instead exoplanets. There are moves afoot to remove that aspect of heliocentricism from the definition of "planet": Replace the concept of orbiting the Sun with orbiting a star, and remove the concept of being more or less round due to hydrostatic equilibrium and you have a quite generic concept.

Orbiting a star rather than the Sun is the obvious first step to making the concept of a planet more inclusive. Removing the concept of being more or less round due to hydrostatic equilibrium is also essential with regard to classifying exoplanets as planets or something else; our instruments are currently far too crude to detect the roundness (or lack thereof) of those exoplanets. The proposed change is that a planet is a non-stellar object that orbits a star and has sufficient mass to clear the neighborhood of its orbit. (This leaves out rogue planets.) Note well: Pluto will still not be a planet per this proposal.
 
  • #9
I'm not sure roundness is any kind of issue-- among all the things we don't know about exoplanets, I'd say we know they are round better than we know almost anything else about them. We certainly cannot say we are going to stick to things we can directly observe, because we cannot directly observe any of their properties, they are all inferred by indirect means that require application of the laws of physics. But I agree it is silly to define planets as objects that orbit the Sun, that is indeed pure heliocentrism. So we should take out that they must orbit the Sun, but can keep that they need to be round, or more reasonably, they need to have enough inferred mass for us to infer that they are round.
 

1. What is a retrograde planet?

A retrograde planet is a planet that appears to be moving backwards in its orbit, relative to the Earth's perspective. This is an illusion caused by the varying speeds and distances of the planets in our solar system.

2. How many retrograde planets are there in our solar system?

There are currently five known retrograde planets in our solar system: Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn.

3. How often do planets go into retrograde?

The frequency of planets going into retrograde varies depending on the planet. Mercury goes into retrograde about three times a year, while Venus, Mars, and Jupiter go into retrograde about once every two years. Saturn goes into retrograde about once a year.

4. How long does a retrograde period last?

The length of a retrograde period also varies depending on the planet. Mercury's retrograde period lasts about three weeks, while Venus' lasts about six weeks. Mars' retrograde period lasts about two and a half months, and Jupiter's and Saturn's retrograde periods last about four months.

5. How does retrograde motion affect astrology and horoscopes?

In astrology, retrograde motion is believed to have an influence on the energies and characteristics associated with a particular planet. During a retrograde period, these energies may be more intense or have a different effect. This can be seen in how horoscopes may change during retrograde periods for different zodiac signs.

Similar threads

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
308
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
5
Views
692
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
3
Views
976
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
666
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
12
Views
5K
Back
Top