Right after the bigbang, microblackholes were formed

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter chhitiz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bigbang
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the formation of micro black holes immediately after the Big Bang and their subsequent evaporation. Participants explore theoretical implications, potential experimental observations related to black holes, and the broader consequences of such phenomena.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant mentions having read that micro black holes formed right after the Big Bang and questions the mechanism of their evaporation.
  • Another participant references Hawking radiation as a possible explanation for the evaporation of black holes.
  • Several participants discuss the potential for the Large Hadron Collider to produce tiny black holes that would evaporate quickly, with some expressing skepticism about the implications of such experiments.
  • Concerns are raised about the risks associated with high-energy experiments, including the idea of "ripping the fabric of space-time" and the potential for encountering higher-dimensional entities.
  • There is a humorous reference to the Mad Scientist's Handbook, suggesting that scientists should be cautious in their experiments.
  • One participant questions the frequency of events that would "rip the fabric of space-time," prompting a light-hearted exchange about fictional representations of such occurrences.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of curiosity and skepticism regarding the formation and evaporation of micro black holes, with no clear consensus on the implications of these phenomena or the safety of experiments like those conducted at the Large Hadron Collider.

Contextual Notes

Some claims rely on theoretical frameworks that may not be universally accepted, and the discussion includes speculative elements about the nature of black holes and higher dimensions.

chhitiz
Messages
223
Reaction score
0
i read somewhere that right after the bigbang, microblackholes were formed which later vaporised. is it true? how can they simply have vaporised?
 
Space news on Phys.org


Don't they theorize that the new Hadron Collider will produce tiny black holes that will evaporate in nano seconds?? (No, I'm not talking about the earth-devouring ones that people are scared of...those come later, lol)
 


orbit-one said:
Don't they theorize that the new Hadron Collider will produce tiny black holes that will evaporate in nano seconds?? (No, I'm not talking about the earth-devouring ones that people are scared of...those come later, lol)

Scientists, mad or otherwise, should never do anything that is going to rip the fabric of space-time. Those kinds of things frequently expose you to higher dimensional monsters and never end well. It's all covered in the Mad Scientist's Handbook. Maybe they should read it at CERN.
 


orbit-one said:
Don't they theorize that the new Hadron Collider will produce tiny black holes that will evaporate in nano seconds??

Some people think so. I seem to recall that if itty bitty black holes are created, this would demonstrate that there are probably more than 4 dimensions and the string theorists will get really really excited and probably drunk. If black holes don't show up, it doesn't mean much of anything, and life goes on as usual, with a few less drunken string theorists.
 


Bob3141592 said:
Scientists, mad or otherwise, should never do anything that is going to rip the fabric of space-time. Those kinds of things frequently expose you to higher dimensional monsters and never end well. It's all covered in the Mad Scientist's Handbook. Maybe they should read it at CERN.

Er... "frequently"? Like when? When was the last time you saw this "rip the fabric of space-time" happening?

Zz.
 


ZapperZ said:
Er... "frequently"? Like when? When was the last time you saw this "rip the fabric of space-time" happening?

i saw it happen on TV once. involved someone named Q.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
24K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
3K