Right inverse clarification needed

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dana1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on defining right inverse functions for the function f: (R*R) -> R, where f(x,y) = x + y. Two right inverse functions are proposed: f1(x) = (x-1, 1) and f2(x) = (x-2, 2), both satisfying the condition f(f1(x)) = x. However, confusion arises regarding the absence of a variable y in f1, leading to the suggestion of using a different variable, t, to clarify definitions. The final clarification emphasizes that the constants used in inverse functions are arbitrary and not tied to the original function's variables.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of functions and their inverses
  • Familiarity with multivariable calculus concepts
  • Knowledge of notation for functions and variables
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of inverse functions in multivariable calculus
  • Learn about the implications of variable substitution in function definitions
  • Explore the concept of right inverses in linear algebra
  • Investigate the use of arbitrary constants in function definitions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying calculus or algebra, and anyone interested in understanding the intricacies of function inverses and their definitions.

dana1
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
f: (R*R)->R
f(x,y)=x+y

if I'm asked to write 2 right inversed fanctions of f.
can I say that:

f1: R-> (R*R)
f1(x)= (x-1, 1)

f2: R-> (R*R)
f1(x)= (x-2, 2)

because: f(f1(x))= f(x-1,1)=x-1+1=x

well this does matches the definition of right inverse function but what bothers me
I guess is that there is no more y on f1.
but it seems more of a problem to define:
f3(x)= (x-y, y)
because then we will receive a hole range of functions. (Whew)

please can someone clarify this point out? thanks so much in advance!(Blush)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dana said:
f: (R*R)->R
f(x,y)=x+y

if I'm asked to write 2 right inversed fanctions of f.
can I say that:

f1: R-> (R*R)
f1(x)= (x-1, 1)

f2: R-> (R*R)
f1(x)= (x-2, 2)

because: f(f1(x))= f(x-1,1)=x-1+1=x

well this does matches the definition of right inverse function but what bothers me
I guess is that there is no more y on f1.
but it seems more of a problem to define:
f3(x)= (x-y, y)
because then we will receive a hole range of functions. (Whew)

please can someone clarify this point out? thanks so much in advance!(Blush)

Hi dana! Welcome to MHB!

That all seems fine to me. ;)

To make the matter less confusing, I would suggest to use a different letter, say t.
So you would have for instance:
$$f_1(t) = (t-1,t)$$
That is be cause this $t$ is in no way connected to the $x$ and $y$ that you have in $f$.

The $y$ that you have in $f_3$ is also not connected to the $y$ in $f$.
It is just an arbitrary constant.
So it would be less confusing to write:
$$f_3(t) = (t - c, c)$$
 
dana said:
f: (R*R)->R
f(x,y)=x+y

if I'm asked to write 2 right inversed fanctions of f.
can I say that:

f1: R-> (R*R)
f1(x)= (x-1, 1)

f2: R-> (R*R)
f1(x)= (x-2, 2)

because: f(f1(x))= f(x-1,1)=x-1+1=x

well this does matches the definition of right inverse function but what bothers me
I guess is that there is no more y on f1.
but it seems more of a problem to define:
f3(x)= (x-y, y)
because then we will receive a hole range of functions. (Whew)

please can someone clarify this point out? thanks so much in advance!(Blush)

You can define an inverse function $\displaystyle x = f^{- 1} (y)$ if it exists a function $\displaystyle y = f(x)$ in which for any value of x there is one and only one value of y. Similarly if You have a two variable function z= f(x,y) You can define two inverse two variable functions $\displaystyle x= f^{-1} (y,z)$ and $\displaystyle y = f^{-1}(x,z)$ if the same conditions are satisfied. In Your case is $\displaystyle z = f(x,y) = x + y$ , so that the two inverse functions are $\displaystyle x = f^{-1} (y,z) = z - y$ and $\displaystyle y = f^{-1} (x,z) = z - x$...

Kind regards$\chi$ $\sigma$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K