Rigorous treatments of double-slit , quantum eraser, etc.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on rigorous treatments of the double-slit experiment and quantum eraser setups, emphasizing the use of quantum mechanics (QM) without classical wave optics. Key references include the Marcella paper for deriving single, double, and multiple slit patterns, and Frank Rioux's work on extending these concepts into two dimensions. The Fourier transform method is suggested as a potentially superior approach for deriving these phenomena, minimizing reliance on classical interpretations. Participants express interest in further insights regarding quantum eraser techniques.

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum Mechanics (QM) principles
  • Fourier Transform methods in physics
  • Understanding of double-slit experiment
  • Familiarity with quantum eraser concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Marcella paper on quantum mechanics applications
  • Explore Frank Rioux's diffraction treatment
  • Research Fourier Transform methods in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate advanced quantum eraser experiments and their implications
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics researchers, and students interested in advanced interpretations of the double-slit experiment and quantum eraser setups.

strangerep
Science Advisor
Messages
3,766
Reaction score
2,214
From a recent double-slit thread:

ZapperZ said:
Check the "[URL
Marcella paper[/URL] that I've cited numerous times to see how
you derive single, double, and multiple slits pattern using QM
without invoking classical wave optics.

In fact, one can even extend this approach into 2D as well without invoking
classical optics. See Frank Rioux treatment of
http://www.users.csbsju.edu/~frioux/diffraction/ej33n1.pdf" .

Thank you for mentioning those papers! (Probably, I didn't notice the earlier
mentions because I hardly ever read the endless "double-slit" threads. :-)

The Fourier transform method occurred to me a while back as possibly
a better way of deriving this stuff (less handwaving and less reliance
on interpretations), but I never found time to work it out fully. It's
good that Marcella has done this.

BTW, are there any treatments of the quantum eraser that extend
such techniques to that setup?

Cheers.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Greg Bernhardt said:
@strangerep did you find any more insight on this topic?
I don't think it's needed. You might as well this thread, since Zz already mentioned the Marcella and Rioux papers elsewhere.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
9K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
8K