What Is the Root of Number Operator in Quantum Mechanics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter KFC
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operator Root
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the properties and implications of a matrix involving the square root of the number operator in quantum mechanics. The matrix A is proposed, and its Hermitian adjoint A^\dagger is questioned, with a suggested form provided. The square root of the number operator is defined through its Taylor expansion, indicating that it acts on Fock states by yielding a factor of \sqrt{N} times the state. It is argued that the matrix cannot directly act on Fock space but may function in a scalar product form when combined with other operators. The conversation highlights the relationship between operator matrices and their action within quantum mechanics, emphasizing their mathematical structure and operational context.
KFC
Messages
477
Reaction score
4
I seen in some paper, there is an matrix whose element has a square root of number operator, e.g.

<br /> A = \left(<br /> \begin{matrix}<br /> \alpha &amp; \gamma \sqrt{\hat{a}\hat{a}^\dagger} \\<br /> -\gamma \sqrt{\hat{a}^\dagger\hat{a} &amp; \beta<br /> \end{matrix}<br /> \right)<br />
where \alpha, \beta, \gamma are real number.

What is A^\dagger? Can I write it as the following?
<br /> A^\dagger = \left(<br /> \begin{matrix}<br /> \alpha &amp; -\gamma \sqrt{\hat{a}^\dagger\hat{a}} \\<br /> \gamma \sqrt{\hat{a}\hat{a}^\dagger &amp; \beta<br /> \end{matrix}<br /> \right)<br />

By the way, if I have it operate on any Fock state, how could the operators in the matrix operating those states?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The square root of the number operator is probably defined by it's taylor expansion. This means that letting the the root of the number operator act on a Fock-state gives you \sqrt{N} times the state. Also since the number operator is self-adjoint this implies that any function of it will be self-adjoint, in particular (\sqrt{a^\dag a})^\dag=\sqrt{a^\dag a}.

One can think of the number operator as matrices themselves (and thus also the square root of the number operator) so what you have is a 2x2 block-matrix. The hermitian adjoint of which is given by what you wrote.

I don't think that this matrix can act on the Fock-space generated by the algebra of a^dag and a. I could imagine that the matrix never acts on the Fock-space by itself only in the form of some "scalar product". What I mean with this is basically some new operator C:

<br /> C=(a_1, a_2)A\begin{pmatrix}b_1\\ b_2\end{pmatrix} <br />

where a_1/2 and b_1/2 can be numbers or operators. Then C can act on the Fock-space.

Compare it with how one sometimes uses "vectors" of operators like

<br /> c=\begin{pmatrix}<br /> a_1 \\<br /> a_2<br /> \end{pmatrix}, \quad c^\dag=(a_1^\dag, a_2^\dag)<br />

but they never really act on Fock-space in this vector form but only in a "scalar product" form. For example the Hamiltonian may look something like

\mathcal{H}=c^\dag H c

usually the elements of the matrix H are real numbers but in principle they could also be operators.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K