Roots of linear sum of Fibonacci polynomials

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding complex numbers x for which the equation Gn = fn-1(x) - 2fn(x) + fn+1(x) = 0 holds, where fn represents Fibonacci polynomials. The problem is reformulated recursively, leading to a characteristic equation whose roots inform the solutions for Gn. Observations indicate that the product of the roots consistently equals 2, and the sum of the roots also appears to equal 2, suggesting a pattern across different polynomial orders. Additionally, the real parts of the solutions are noted to be greater than zero, raising questions about the underlying reasons for this behavior. The conversation invites further exploration and insights into the properties of these polynomial roots.
ekkilop
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
For what complex numbers, x, is

Gn = fn-1(x) - 2fn(x) + fn+1(x) = 0

where the terms are consecutive Fibonacci polynomials?

Here's what I know:

1) Each individual polynomial, fm, has roots x=2icos(kπ/m), k=1,...,m-1.

2) The problem can be rewritten recursively as
Gn+2 = xGn+1 + Gn,
G1 = x-2,
G2 = x2 - 2x + 2
with characteristic equation Y2 - xY - 1.
If a and b are the roots of the characteristic equation, then
Gn = an + bn - 2(an - bn)/(a-b)
Choosing x=-2icosh(z) is an option that leads to an expression in terms of cosh(nx), sinh(nx) and sinh(x) but it doesn't get me any further.

Has anyone got an idea on an alternative approach to this problem?
Does anyone know of previous studies of this type of problem?

Thank you
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Some approach to guess solutions:

G1 has a single solution ##x=2##
G2 has two solutions ##x=1\pm i##
##G_3 = x^3-2x^2+3x-2## has three solutions ##x=1##, ##x=\frac{1}{2}(1\pm i\sqrt{7})##
##G_4 = x^4-2x^3+4x^2-4x+2## has four solutions ##x=\frac{1}{2}(1\pm i)-\sqrt{-1\mp \frac{i}{2}}## and ##x=\frac{1}{2}(1\pm i)+\sqrt{-1\mp \frac{i}{2}}##
The product of all solutions is 2 in all tested cases, and looking at the recursive definition and the first expressions I think this will be true for all n.

G_5 gives an interesting graph for the roots. Looks a bit like a christmas tree.
Same thing for G_6, but without simplification the expression is quite long.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for your reply!

Interesting observations. Yes, you're right! The product of the solutions will be 2 since G can be written as the characteristic polynomial of a matrix with determinant 2. Since the solutions come in complex conjugated pairs this suggests some pretty strict bounds.

The solutions also add up to 2 as it seems.

Have you got any clues to why the real part of the solutions are larger than zero?
 
Last edited:
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K