Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Roots of linear sum of Fibonacci polynomials

  1. Nov 30, 2012 #1
    For what complex numbers, x, is

    Gn = fn-1(x) - 2fn(x) + fn+1(x) = 0

    where the terms are consecutive Fibonacci polynomials?

    Here's what I know:

    1) Each individual polynomial, fm, has roots x=2icos(kπ/m), k=1,...,m-1.

    2) The problem can be rewritten recursively as
    Gn+2 = xGn+1 + Gn,
    G1 = x-2,
    G2 = x2 - 2x + 2
    with characteristic equation Y2 - xY - 1.
    If a and b are the roots of the characteristic equation, then
    Gn = an + bn - 2(an - bn)/(a-b)
    Choosing x=-2icosh(z) is an option that leads to an expression in terms of cosh(nx), sinh(nx) and sinh(x) but it doesn't get me any further.

    Has anyone got an idea on an alternative approach to this problem?
    Does anyone know of previous studies of this type of problem?

    Thank you
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 30, 2012 #2

    mfb

    User Avatar
    2016 Award

    Staff: Mentor

    Some approach to guess solutions:

    G1 has a single solution ##x=2##
    G2 has two solutions ##x=1\pm i##
    ##G_3 = x^3-2x^2+3x-2## has three solutions ##x=1##, ##x=\frac{1}{2}(1\pm i\sqrt{7})##
    ##G_4 = x^4-2x^3+4x^2-4x+2## has four solutions ##x=\frac{1}{2}(1\pm i)-\sqrt{-1\mp \frac{i}{2}}## and ##x=\frac{1}{2}(1\pm i)+\sqrt{-1\mp \frac{i}{2}}##
    The product of all solutions is 2 in all tested cases, and looking at the recursive definition and the first expressions I think this will be true for all n.

    G_5 gives an interesting graph for the roots. Looks a bit like a christmas tree.
    Same thing for G_6, but without simplification the expression is quite long.
     
    Last edited: Nov 30, 2012
  4. Nov 30, 2012 #3
    Thanks for your reply!

    Interesting observations. Yes, you're right! The product of the solutions will be 2 since G can be written as the characteristic polynomial of a matrix with determinant 2. Since the solutions come in complex conjugated pairs this suggests some pretty strict bounds.

    The solutions also add up to 2 as it seems.

    Have you got any clues to why the real part of the solutions are larger than zero?
     
    Last edited: Nov 30, 2012
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Roots of linear sum of Fibonacci polynomials
  1. Fibonacci sums (Replies: 5)

  2. Linear Polynomials (Replies: 1)

  3. Roots of polynomial (Replies: 12)

  4. Polynomial roots (Replies: 1)

Loading...