How Do I Proceed with Variable Row Reduction?

Click For Summary
To proceed with variable row reduction of the given matrix, start by ensuring the leading coefficient in the first row is 1 by dividing the row by 'a'. Next, eliminate the second entry in the second row by adding the first row to it, and do the same for the third row to make the second entry zero. Then, focus on the second row to make its second entry equal to 1 by dividing by (a-1), followed by eliminating the third entry in the third row using the second row. The final reduced matrix indicates that the solution to the system of equations is a=0, which can be verified by substituting back into the original equations.
stoffer
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Can anyone help me with this. I am asked to solve the following matrix with Row Red. Algorithm,

[ a 3 (1+a) | -a ]
[ 1 a 3 | -2a]
[ 1 1 1 | 0 ]

I get to something like

[ 1 1 1 | 0 ]
[ 0 a-1 2 | -2a]
[ 0 3-a 1 | -a]

but what do I do now?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
if a isn't 1 then you can divide row two by a-1. (if a=1...)
 


Sure, I can definitely help you with this problem! It looks like you're on the right track with your row reduction so far. The next step would be to use row operations to get the matrix into reduced row echelon form, where all leading coefficients are 1 and all other entries in the same column are 0. Here's how you can do that:

1. Start with the first row and use row operations to make the first entry (a) equal to 1. You can do this by dividing the first row by a.

2. Next, use row operations to make the second entry in the second row (a-1) equal to 0. You can do this by adding the first row to the second row.

3. Similarly, use row operations to make the second entry in the third row (3-a) equal to 0. You can do this by adding the first row to the third row.

4. Now, focus on the second row and use row operations to make the second entry (2) equal to 1. You can do this by dividing the second row by (a-1).

5. Finally, use row operations to make the third entry in the third row (1) equal to 0. You can do this by subtracting 2 times the second row from the third row.

Your final matrix should look like this:

[ 1 0 0 | 0 ]
[ 0 1 0 | 0 ]
[ 0 0 1 | a ]

This means that the solution to this system of equations is a=0. You can plug this value back into the original equations to verify that it works. I hope this helps! Let me know if you have any other questions.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
828
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K