MHB Rower Goes Upstream 2.8 km in 48 Minutes

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bushy
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A rower successfully travels upstream for 2.8 km in 48 minutes, with an upstream speed of 6 km/h and a downstream speed of 10 km/h. The calculation involves using the formula for speed, where total time equals the sum of upstream and downstream times. The correct total time is noted as 48 minutes, equivalent to 4/5 of an hour. After solving the equation, it confirms the distance traveled upstream is indeed 2.8 km. The discussion highlights the importance of accurately converting time units in calculations.
Bushy
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
A rower travels upstream at 6 km/hand back to the starting place at 10 km/h.The total
journeytakes 48 minutes. How far upstream did the rower go?

My approach is to use speed = distance / time

The total time =upstream time + downstream time

In hours

0.75 = x/6 + x/10

solving I get 45 = 10x + 6x

x = 2.8 km


 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hmmm...well 48 minutes is 4/5 of an hour, not 3/4. :D
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
38
Views
8K
Replies
5
Views
3K
4
Replies
175
Views
25K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
10K
Back
Top