I Russia Claims Laser Weapon Can Destroy Drones: Is it Possible?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter peetm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Drones Laser
AI Thread Summary
Russia claims to have developed a laser weapon capable of destroying drones from a distance of 1,500 km, though details remain scarce. The feasibility of such a weapon is questioned due to potential atmospheric scattering and energy absorption challenges. While theoretically possible with advanced targeting and large apertures, practical implementation may not occur within the foreseeable future. The discussion highlights implications for satellite vulnerability, particularly for Elon Musk's satellite constellation, which may require protective measures against laser threats. Overall, the concept raises significant technical and strategic considerations in modern warfare.
Science news on Phys.org
It would be difficult, but with a large enough aperture and suitable targeting mechanisms, you could cook a satellite in 5 seconds and render it space junk.

I don't expect to see such a machine in my lifetime.

It would create an interesting problem for Elon. The exact methods he is using to keep his constellation from being a nuisance to astronomers would tend to make his satellites more vulnerable to such a laser.

Against a laser, you would want reflective surface. But a dark surface that can take the heat would work as well. Communication satellites could be readily hardened. Optical satellites would be a different matter.
 
I was disappointed when the Airborne Laser was cancelled:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_YAL-1

It seems to fit the bill, with a range of a few hundred km. I'm not sure what the point of 1,800 km would be, as that's much higher than most satellites (but lower than geosynchronous/stationary).
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...

Similar threads

Back
Top