Russia Claims Laser Weapon Can Destroy Drones: Is it Possible?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter peetm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Drones Laser
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Russia claims to have developed a laser weapon capable of destroying drones from a distance of 1,500 km. The feasibility of such a weapon raises questions about energy absorption by the atmosphere and scattering effects. While theoretically possible with a large aperture and precise targeting, practical implementation remains uncertain. The discussion highlights potential vulnerabilities for satellites, particularly communication and optical types, against such laser technology.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of laser physics and atmospheric effects
  • Knowledge of satellite technology and vulnerabilities
  • Familiarity with targeting mechanisms in weapon systems
  • Awareness of historical laser weapon systems, such as the Boeing YAL-1
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of laser propagation through the atmosphere
  • Explore advancements in satellite hardening techniques against laser threats
  • Investigate the capabilities and limitations of current laser weapon systems
  • Examine the implications of laser technology on space debris management
USEFUL FOR

Defense technology analysts, aerospace engineers, satellite operators, and anyone interested in the intersection of laser weaponry and satellite technology.

Science news on Phys.org
It would be difficult, but with a large enough aperture and suitable targeting mechanisms, you could cook a satellite in 5 seconds and render it space junk.

I don't expect to see such a machine in my lifetime.

It would create an interesting problem for Elon. The exact methods he is using to keep his constellation from being a nuisance to astronomers would tend to make his satellites more vulnerable to such a laser.

Against a laser, you would want reflective surface. But a dark surface that can take the heat would work as well. Communication satellites could be readily hardened. Optical satellites would be a different matter.
 
I was disappointed when the Airborne Laser was cancelled:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_YAL-1

It seems to fit the bill, with a range of a few hundred km. I'm not sure what the point of 1,800 km would be, as that's much higher than most satellites (but lower than geosynchronous/stationary).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 96 ·
4
Replies
96
Views
11K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K