Russian Nuke Sub Crew Prevented ‘Planetary Catastrophe’

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nuke Russian
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The recent fire aboard a Russian nuclear-powered submarine resulted in the tragic deaths of 14 sailors, who are credited with preventing a potential "planetary catastrophe," according to Captain Sergei Pavlov. The fire was reportedly triggered by a short circuit in the control center, which spread smoke throughout the submarine, complicating evacuation efforts. While some speculate that the incident was exaggerated for the sake of comforting the victims' families, the situation highlighted the risks associated with nuclear submarines, particularly during deep-sea missions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nuclear submarine operations
  • Knowledge of fire safety protocols in confined spaces
  • Familiarity with submarine design and engineering
  • Awareness of historical submarine incidents and their implications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the design and safety features of Russian nuclear submarines
  • Study the K-278 incident for lessons on submarine fire management
  • Examine the protocols for deep-sea exploration missions
  • Investigate the implications of nuclear accidents in maritime environments
USEFUL FOR

Naval engineers, military personnel, safety officers, and anyone interested in submarine operations and nuclear safety protocols.

Messages
19,865
Reaction score
10,860
Anyone been following this story? Sensational or did we really narrowly miss a global nuclear disaster? What were the possible consequences of the fire spreading to the reactor?

The 14 sailors who died during a fire last week on a nuclear-powered Russian military submarine prevented a “planetary catastrophe,” a top naval officer said at their funeral, according to media reports.

Captain Sergei Pavlov, an aide to the commander of Russia’s navy, praised the heroism of the men, who died as they battled to stop the fire from spreading in the submersible.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...nuke-sub-crew-prevented-planetary-catastrophe
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think so. As long as the vessel was dove, the impacts of a meltdown should be contained to a small region of the ocean. As it was a research vessel, it hardly had nuclear rockets on board, and even if, could a fire ignite more than the rocket fuel?

My suspicion is, as it was said at the funeral, that it was mainly meant to comfort the relatives, rather than an actual description of the threat.

Wiki says we have currently seven confirmed losses of atomic subs, 2 US and 5 Russian, and none of it posed an immediate threat, although their machines will sooner or later rust and release radioactivity.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Rive and Greg Bernhardt
The daily Kommersant, citing military circles, reported that the fire was apparently triggered by a short circuit in the control center, setting fire to cables or oil. Through the ventilation system, the smoke was then distributed to the other sections of the submarine. The crew did not have enough time to protect themselves. Only five surviving crew members had managed to extinguish the fire and bring the submarine back up.

The Kremlin had previously stated that it was a deep-sea submarine on a seafloor exploration mission. However, with senior army officers on board, it is believed that this was no ordinary mission.

(https://www.dw.com/de/russischer-u-boot-unfall-brandursache-klar/a-49469110)
 
K-278
Can be a reference for the 'worst case'.
 
Filip Larsen said:
In case anyone is interested, Ars Technica also ran an article on the accident:

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy...0-fathoms-the-fire-aboard-russias-secret-sub/
Wow, that's an unusual submarine! I didn't know that deep-diving subs like that existed. 6000m depth is pretty incredible...

246391
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K